Stewardship

Recently a friend of mine has come into possession of venerable instrument—a cello, to be exact—that was built before he was born and (with a little TLC) is likely to survive his own death. Likewise, the instrument has had many owners and will continue to be played and appreciated by others many years into the future. The cellist’s stewardship of this instrument is a just tiny blip on the lifeline of its history.

This tangible example also makes manifest a truth about music (and life) that is often obscured by our own myopia: more often than not, we are guardians and caretakers of experiences that we typically assume to be uniquely “ours”. When we practice an instrument or compose a new work, we are drawing upon hundreds of years of musical and technical knowledge, and through interfacing with our own unique personalities we transform that knowledge into something novel passed on to future generations; therefore, “my” music is really something like 90% outsourced, with my own contributions comprising only a sliver of the research, experimentation, and notational decisions necessary for “my” piece’s completion. The illusion of ownership is a combination of disingenuity and the ego’s drive to obscure our own relative insignificance.

Our dominant culture and many traditional religions have asserted the view that human beings are entities that somehow stand outside of nature, rather than existing as a part of it. The chief arrogance of our civilization lies in thinking that we are not subject to the same natural laws that govern everything else—whether expressed as an economic paradigm built on the wish-dream of infinite growth on a finite planet, or as the Abrahamic illusion of humanity’s supposed “dominion” over nature. The idea that we share in a larger process leads to a fuller awareness of our responsibilities to that process and to each other.

Like the life of an instrument, musical forms also connect to a lifeline of their own. I’m right now composing a piece based on an ancient dance form, and I have to wonder about the various circumstances of its historical use as well as the way it has influenced myriad compositions besides my own. Every time we create, compose, or improvise music, we are most likely tying into forms, scales, aesthetic notions, and performance practices that did not originate with us, and may be transformed beyond our recognition in the future. Our creativity tends to be expressed in modification, transformation, or even copying errors—which are such minute (if significant) details that it almost seems like a crime to see my own name listed on a concert program without any shout-outs to Bach, Hendrix, Pythagoras, and the like. Our culture seems obsessed with locating creativity and knowledge within the bounds of the auteur’s skull, whereas the archaic conception of knowledge (as something shared and cultivated by the community rather than possessed by an individual) might be closer to the mark.

2 thoughts on “Stewardship

  1. David

    Have you heard the music of Johannes Kreidler? I just recently came across a youtube clip of a presentation he gave of some recent music. One piece was a commission, I forget exactly how much, lets say 3000 euros. What he did was apply to his music the very same exploitative practices that countries and large corporations do with their business. Using material from previous pieces as the material for the work, he hired an arranger from china for something like 200 euros to create the score according to certain criteria. He also hired a writer from india to produce the program notes.

    This might not be of interest to many. But my point is that if we are going to be thanking pythagoras and Bach, perhaps it would be worth acknowledging our role not in nature but in commerce (however reluctant we may be about it) and thank – or even better- comment in some way upon the circumstances that create a work to be performed. I’m not saying all the time, but it is definitely worthwhile.

    Ah, just found the title. Its called fremdarbeit (outsourcing).

    Reply
  2. danvisconti

    Hi David, thanks for sharing this very interesting Kreidler piece!

    I agree that it can be rewarding to examine economic models through music; however, I feel like this approach isn’t so much an alternative to the continuum of musical thought I described as it is one of the particular expressions of that continuum.

    By relating to our role in commerce, creation, or any other aspect of music we become obligated to locate ourselves within a larger tradition. It’s this sense of connectedness to the past, future, and other people that allows one to speak out against the frequent silliness and perversity of that same tradition.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Conversation and respectful debate is vital to the NewMusicBox community. However, please remember to keep comments constructive and on-topic. Avoid personal attacks and defamatory language. We reserve the right to remove any comment that the community reports as abusive or that the staff determines is inappropriate.