Category: Articles

NewMusicBox asks: Can music for dance stand alone? Margaret Fairlie-Kennedy



Photo by Alan Mills

For me, an avid dance lover, writing music for dance should be an in-depth collaboration with the choreographer. In the mutually achieved entity neither dance nor music is subservient; the music, however, should be able to stand alone. Initially, I must know the choreographer’s musical experience, relationship to sound with movement, communication goals, and the predominant context of the dance. A structured working procedure can then be discussed and established.

An example would be my collaboration with Peggy Lawler, former director of dance at Cornell University.

Peggy possessed an intense musical awareness. Her project, Waiting and Listening, was inspired by James Agee‘s text describing night sounds in a forest. Responding to her concept of translating the text to dance, including context, structure, duration, and pacing, I heard sounds emerging for woodwinds, strings, percussion. Peggy’s movement concerns urged fluidity, merging tones and textures, and extended lines toward a climactic point; she did not want pulse or constricting rhythms. Her structure was ‘layered,’ combining groups in different tempos, contrasting moods, shadowy flitting figures, sudden bursts of energy; I layered live and synthesized sound. Nature sounds were blended on tape with a synthesized background through which loon wails and owl calls emerged at intervals. Tape and live sound were first used separately, then interwoven, ending with lone loon wails.

Hear a RealAudio sample  from the tape part of Waiting and Listening (Night Calls)

NewMusicBox asks: Can music for dance stand alone? Behzad Ranjbaran



Dance Music or Music for Dance?

It is an exciting opportunity when a composer is commissioned to write for dance since dancers are some of the most open-minded champions of new music. Several years ago, this opportunity was awarded to me when I was commissioned by Nashville Ballet and Meet the Composer to compose music for a story ballet in collaboration with choreographer Diane Coburn Bruning. Nashville Ballet and the Nashville Symphony premiered the new ballet, The Blood of Seyavash, which was inspired by an ancient Persian legend in September 1994.

In the process of conceiving the work, I contemplated whether to write the music specifically for the ballet or to compose program music that is suitable both for a story ballet and the concert stage. As the episodic and sectional nature of many story ballets did not appeal to me, I settled on an organic and cyclical organization for the music. Subsequently, the ballet was composed for an epilogue and seven scenes that could be performed in two versions: first, with pauses to accommodate for scene changes in the ballet, and a second, a concert version that could be performed continuously without pause.



From Ranjbaran’s ballet The Blood of Seyavash

 

As a result of the success of the ballet, the idea of an orchestral trilogy based on Persian legends was born. Of course, there are many successful works, which are written for dance, and the music is most satisfying when it is accompanied by dance. However, I am delighted that by choosing to write concert program music, I was able to include the music of the ballet in my Persian Trilogy of orchestral works. These three works have become the fulfillment of my life-long desire to create a body of orchestral works that are inspired by the Persian legends that have fascinated me since childhood.

In Conversation with Steve Reich



Steve Reich

An interview with the author on the publication of his Writings on Music 1965-2000

Molly Sheridan: Because we’re doing this issue on dance, I would like to speak a little bit about your feelings on dance. I was interested to read in one of the excerpts we’ve used here on NewMusicBox about how you had really never anticipated seeing your work with dancers. Have you felt any inspiration since then to write work specifically for dance?

Steve Reich: Well, I’m actually going to do it, but have I put any thought into it? No, absolutely not. No, I mean I just happen to be who I am. [laughs] My music has a very strong rhythmic profile, as everybody knows, and dancers picked up on that very early on so I’m frequently choreographed. I’m delighted about that because I’ve always enjoyed watching dance. I haven’t seen by any means all the pieces that have been done to my music but I certainly have seen those by de Keersmaeker, Kylian, and others. So it isn’t something that I’ve ever done specifically. A sextet was written with Laura Dean in mind but it was also an instrumental piece and, to be honest, I would have written what I wrote anyway but she was part of the commission. I’m going to write, I guess in September, a piece for de Keersmaeker, just a short five-minute piece that will be part of a long piece, with lots of little chunks by different composers whose names I don’t really have at the tip of my tongue, and that will be done specifically for dance. She’s going to send me a tape of something that she’s pre-choreographed so I’m supposed to look at that. But again I’ll look at it and it may give me some ideas and then again I may just go ahead and do what I would do anyway.

Molly Sheridan: You mention in your book that dancers understand your music. Do they understand it in a way that other people don’t?

Steve Reich: Well, no I’m not saying that. I’m saying that the music is very rhythmic… I mean Stravinsky was very frequently choreographed. Well, why? Well, it’s very obvious why. It’s because his music was very rhythmic and it lent itself to dance. You know, Arvo Pärt is a wonderful composer but he doesn’t lend himself to dance because he isn’t very rhythmic. It’s really no more complicated than that.

Molly Sheridan: So this book covers 30 years of your thinking about music and commenting on it. For other composers who read this book today, what do you hope that they are able to take away from it?

Steve Reich: Well, I’m assuming that anybody who reads the book is reading it because they’re interested in my music which I say right in front, very first thing. If you’re interested in a composer’s music then you might be interested in how they think about the music and about other music. I mean, I read Stravinsky’s Poetics of Music. I was a great Stravinsky lover and the book just sort of clarified things and gave me some sort of feeling for who he was or at least who he was at that time and, you know, it wasn’t an essential ingredient but it certainly was a clarifying and intensifying ingredient in just understanding who Stravinsky was as a human being and as a composer. So if someone is interested in what I’m doing they can follow these writings which vary as much as the music varies. I suppose if someone heard Piano Phase and then they heard Desert Music they might not think it was the same composer and I wouldn’t blame them. I think that’s reflected in the writings. “Music as a Gradual Process” is a very terse, just a very good essay that fits hand in glove with those early pieces, but of course it has very little to say about a lot of the later work. So yes, I think that any composer who looks at it may also get some of the very specific musical ideas—for instance the approach to non-western music in terms of the structure rather than its sound, what is phasing, what is rhythmic substitution. And later on the use of the voice both as a vocalise and in the conventional singing of words, the reappraisment of medieval techniques in light of today’s music, specifically things like augmentation. In a technical sense, in a shop talk sense, for some composers this isn’t what they should do but so that they can say, “Um-hmm, well, you know this is something to chew on and I’ll either spit it out or I’ll digest it,” and it will come out as something different.

Molly Sheridan: I’m curious too because this book covers a period of developing thought for you, is there anything in it that you don’t believe anymore or that you’ve revised in your own mind?

Steve Reich: Well, not really. I mean it’s a funny question. I don’t believe in manifestos. I think people who get into manifestos are always blockheads, and yes that includes some very famous manifestos. I mean basically I think what they do is they set themselves up as tin pot gods and then they proceed to march in lockstep with their thoughts the rest of their lives. And that’s a very poor way of proceeding in music and a very poor way of proceeding in life. The early essays no longer describe what I’m doing nor do I feel the way I felt when I wrote them. Do I believe them? Well I believe in them. I think that the early writings are a very good reflection of me in my late 20s and early 30s and of the music that I wrote at that time. Yes, I believe in everything in the book in the sense that I thought “Yes, this is worth publishing,” but I don’t hold the same positions throughout my life and the book shows that. And that’s part of what the book is about.

Molly Sheridan: I was also curious, when we did our issue on minimalism, we received a lot of great feedback but we also heard from those who, I think one comment was from someone who felt minimalism isn’t even music. I think that was the most extreme. So I just have to ask, do think this book has the power to convert?

Steve Reich: Not at all. [Laughs] I think everybody believes what they believe. As I said, people are going to read this book because they’re interested in my music. Those people who feel the way you’ve just described, you know, that think this isn’t even music, then obviously they’re just going to pass it by or thumb through it and make some snide remark and that will be the end of it. I’m just offering it out there to those who are interested and those who reject me prima facia, well, you know, let’s hope time passes and others replace them.

Molly Sheridan: Final question then. We were talking about how this book might influence other composers and I know you started to mention some of the texts that have influenced you. I just want you to talk a little bit more about that…

Steve Reich: Well, again as I say, there are two levels to the book. One level, in terms of other composers, is a technical level. As Writings goes, it’s a relatively good chunk of that. There are a lot of score excerpts, there’s some analysis of Af
rican music, there’s some analysis of Hebrew chant. One of the articles that strikes me as very chock full of information and interesting thinking is “Music and Language” which also gets back into quoting a lot of Bartók and Janáèek and African musicologists talking about African languages. Also, the relationship between electronics and live music, all of these thoughts that I think, I don’t expect anyone, as a matter of fact I think I’d be disappointed if someone picked up and started to do something that I’ve done, but I do think it’s worthy of consideration. It’s unpredictable what the thoughts of one composer will produce in the mind of another, and that’s what’s genuinely interesting. You teach a student to, let’s say, write a canon, we all learn that in school. Now what results from that? We’ve got canons back in 13th century, we’ve got canons in Bach, we’ve got canons in Bartók, and we’ve got the Webern symphony, and we’ve got my work. The same idea generates vastly different kinds of music and I think that’s really interesting. I hope that my book can make some small contribution in that direction.

Molly Sheridan: Are there any books by composers that you keep on your shelves?

Steve Reich: Well the Stravinsky Poetics are still there, and the writings of Bela Bartók are still there, and I would say that they are at the top of my list. I have read Ives‘s Essays Before a Sonata, which are more sort of ruminations and ejaculations [laughs] but I mean I’m a great admirer of Charles Ives so I’ve read that too. And I’ve read some of Schoenberg‘s work and I almost ripped the book up.

Molly Sheridan: But it got you thinking…

Steve Reich: Well, it got me aware of who he was, or who he appears to be in the articles which is rather…Well, I find him extremely unattractive in a human sense and again I admire some of his early pieces but once the theory got set and Opus 23, I’m definitly not in the fan club anymore. But yes, I don’t know if Webern has any writings but I read the big book that, the Moldenhauder book about him years ago. And of course I read Morty Feldman‘s essays, and they are delightful. And I also read The Boulez-Cage Correspondence; that’s a very interesting book. So those all are sitting on my shelf.

How does gender affect your music? Ursel Schlicht



Photo by Joerg Steinmetz

Gender has definitely had an effect on my compositional voice—which I only came to realize gradually in conjunction with my research about women composers in jazz.

What becomes the “mainstream” in jazz—and virtually all other kinds of music—has primarily been determined by men. Women and men tend to be guided towards different socially predetermined choices of instruments and musical styles. Often, women musicians grow into jazz without a peer group and are not encouraged to explore professional careers outside of classical music. This places many women outside the mainstream. It also tends to encourage other—and often very interesting—forms of artistic expression, adding significantly to the multiple forms of jazz-based music played today. The concept of a mainstream seems to shift towards a multitude of musical expression, reflecting today’s broader understanding of gender. We have moved from the classic dichotomy of maleness and femaleness towards a variety of ways women and men identify with gender.

While I was growing up in Oldenburg, Germany, the music education available to me took the form of classical lessons. Trained on the recorder and then piano, I dropped those lessons at age 15 and began studying the music I was more attracted to—at first, folk and rock; later jazz and other forms of improvisation. Local musicians who played in rock or jazz bands around town told me that you “can’t learn how to improvise.” Fascinated by the school rock band, it didn’t even occur to me that I—as a girl—could have sat down at that drum set. Listening to Jethro Tull, I started to learn the flute, playing along with Ian Anderson’s solos on the record. But without any context (like a band or a workshop), I eventually stopped doing it.

When I was 21, a jazz workshop with pianist Ann Ballester and guitarist Mimi Lorenzini in southern France opened up whole new musical worlds for me. I realized there actually were methods to learn how to play jazz. Having a woman pianist as my instructor added significantly to my new enthusiasm.

I subsequently studied music education in Kassel, Germany, one of the few universities to offer a broad range of classes, including a big band and group improvisation. There was only one jazz harmony/arrangement class available and I was the only student to finish an entire big band arrangement. However, it was never performed by the big band and I was not encouraged to continue writing. I felt that this absence of support had to do with my being a woman. Giving my work public exposure would have meant taking me seriously as a musician. The university environment didn’t seem to be ready to do that.

Several years later, I studied with Joanne Brackeen in New York. I had long been fascinated by her music and it was my first time studying with a woman musician since my experience in France. Her initial assignment was to have me finish some musical drafts and a week later I had completed two jazz compositions that are still being played today. I wrote a series of original pieces and then Brackeen recommended that I practice more “traditional” writing and do a “standard-type tune.” I couldn’t do it to my satisfaction. What came out was a harmonically modern piece in standard A-A-B-A form. Anything closer to a jazz standard felt like a clichÈ—stealing, copying, plagiarizing music that I didn’t consider my own no matter how much I loved it.

While working on my dissertation, “It’s Gotta Be Music First: Zur Bedeutung, Rezeption und Arbeitssituation von Jazzmusikerinnen” (“On the Impact, Perception and Working Situation of Women Jazz Musicians,” now published by Coda, 2000), I studied other women’s biographies, their approaches to music and composition. Many women instrumentalists play instruments less common in jazz: high woodwinds and strings instead of rhythm section and brass instruments.

It has been my observation that a high percentage of women composers have developed strong individual voices and incorporated a variety of stylistic elements. For example, a number of big bands composers, such as Toshiko Akiyoshi, Carla Bley, Maria Schneider, Anita Brown, or the United Women’s Orchestra in Europe, have each developed very distinct sounds. This seems to indicate that lacking peer groups, traditions, or a mainstream can lead to different artistic results.

In my own approach to improvisation and composition, this realization opened up a new set of choices. Like many women musicians, I felt that not having grown up with jazz from an early age presented a strong musical disadvantage and catching up on musical experience and technical skills seemed almost impossible. Instead, feeling that it’s “okay” not to become a mainstream player, finding a lot of music outside of the mainstream and significant contributions by women has helped to free me from the initial pressure to ground my work exclusively in the jazz tradition.

Today, my music is informed by a larger set of role models, inspirations, and settings than during my first years studying jazz. I experiment with different styles of jazz, including European and American forms of free improvised music, and listen to various contemporary composers and improvisers from both the “downtown” and the “uptown” scenes. Currently, my compositions tend to use frameworks for improvisation other than jazz tunes written for specific ensembles.

For example, at the Music OMI artists’ residency last summer, I did a conceptual piece for sixteen musicians which played to everybody’s strengths ranging from jazz to computer music, including a theremin, tabla, and turntables. At the moment, I am writing some pieces for an upcoming recording session on the CIMP label for my quartet, a group that largely plays free improvised music, and am also preparing music for a trio performance with piano, synthesizers, live electronics, and voice. During this year’s documenta, the world’s largest avant-garde art exhibition in Kassel, Germany, I curated an international collaboration between eight musicians of very different musical backgrounds from the U.S., Germany, Eritrea, India, and Afghanistan. Although I use different settings and concepts, my background as a jazz player is always an integral part of both my improvisation and my compositions.

How does gender affect your music? Jamie Baum



Photo by Sandra Eisner

When asked if gender has had an influence on my compositions, my reaction was of surprise—surprise that I hadn’t been asked that question before, not in 20 years of performing. I’ve been interviewed by the press, radio, television, and during panel discussions. There have always been questions regarding the experience and difficulties of being a woman in the jazz profession, but not about the ways gender might affect my compositional style. I hadn’t thought much about it.

In reflecting on that question, I will respond in two parts. I can’t say that I’ve ever thought about it consciously, nor that I have any specific ideas about how gender affects my writing style. I have never sat down and tried to write anything that I thought would reflect my gender or tried to write a piece that would have “feminine qualities.” I’ve never thought about masculine or feminine qualities of music, but instead about color, tension, beauty, contrast, density, transparency, intensity, tranquility, groove, feel, etc.

For example, my most recent writing projects have been for my septet. Many of the pieces that I’ve written for this group have been influenced by Bartók, Stravinsky, and Ives. From the conceptual to the specific, each piece incorporates an idea into the jazz idiom, whether it be rhythmic, motivic, metric, or through orchestration. I use this as a way to expand the form for improvisation. Other influences include context, hearing something new that I want to learn about or explore, visual art, and other musicians who inspire me.

The second part of the answer is simply that my compositions (hopefully) reflect who I am, my experiences, feelings, and musical tastes. Since I’m obviously a woman, it’s probable that my experiences as a woman are reflected in my “world view,” shaping who I am and my music in turn.

How does gender affect your music? Amina Claudine Myers



Photo courtesy Also Productions, Inc.

Gender doesn’t have anything to do with my compositions. Well, not that I know of. My music comes from how I see my life, how I see other people, nature, my experiences, things that I see and think about. You could be either male or female to do it that way. So, I don’t have much to say about it.

As far as I know, I’ve never lost a gig for being a female. I was always encouraged and I never felt slighted or anything negative. Never. I’ve had some people come up and say, “Man, can you play? Are you good?”—you know, just messing with me. And I’ll just say to them, “Well, I’ve been playing a long time. I should be by now.”

I was encouraged to compose in the AACM (Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians) by members who were in there before me. I was not one of the charter members, but I had moved to Chicago in ’63 and joined in ’65 or ’66, right after it was organized. I was playing in a trio in a club with the drummer Ajaramu ñ he brought me into the AACM—and I started hearing other things. Ajaramu would always say to play what you hear.

There was so much going on in the AACM—a beehive of activity—and you got information. It was very, very stimulating. I had not been outgoing musically, but I was encouraged by Muhal Richard Abrams to play the music that they had and then I realized that I could write from watching what others were doing.

I saw the musicians making their own—I won’t say styles, because it wasn’t styles—but they were creating, opening up new territories of writing. You don’t have to follow a formula of eight or sixteen bars, or have a piano, bass, and drums. You could do all sorts of things. Everybody had a different way of writing music: [Anthony] Braxton, [Wadada] Leo Smith, Roscoe [Mitchell], Muhal, and Kalaparusha [Maurice McIntyre]. They were also drawing and painting. And I thought, “Oh, music can be made all sorts of ways.” I realized I could do that, too, that I could write and that what I wrote would work. It was open to any kind of creativity that you could think of. That made the music grow.

That’s what was so great about the AACM. It created new methods. That’s about the best way I can describe it. But we created that organization in order to have a place to play, to express ourselves. Also we had a program for underprivileged children, you know, free music lessons. Some of us were dying musically in Chicago because the places were closing down, so we created our own space. Otherwise, we would have had nowhere to work or play.

Being female did not make a difference. There were other female members in there from time to time. A couple of piano players, dancers, singers. There weren’t a whole lot of us, but we were interested. I can’t say why there weren’t more females. Nobody was turned down if they were creative and they wanted to belong. You know, in a lot of these musical organizations, there are often more men than women. It’s just happened that way. There are other women in there now. You know, I’m still a member. It’s still going on.

My compositions come from the creative spirit, my ancestors, the angels, and other spiritual beings. Sometimes I don’t know what I’m going to do. It’s very difficult when you have to sit down and just write something. For instance, I have an eight-voice choir. (Originally, it was sixteen, but it’s eight for touring.) I was getting ready to brush my teeth and three little motifs came to me. I had a lyric coloratura soloist and one of them was a melody that came for her with a snare drum accompaniment in a military style. In another song I was writing, I had wanted to use all the names of the creator: God, Hosanna, Jehovah. I had already started writing that particular song, but things came to me that were very, very simple and effective. So, I let go of the one that I had started writing, the one I had been just making myself write, and went with the feeling that came. Another time, I was sleeping and a whole song came to me. I got up and wrote it down. It’s called “Blessings.”

I believe that there are other beings around us like our spiritual guides. Sometimes when you’re trying to create, you get stuck and you think I don’t know how I’m going to do it. They’ll help you.

In Conversation with William Bauer



Molly Sheridan: Why don’t we start by talking a little bit about what first drew you to this kind of scholarship on Betty Carter?

William Bauer: I went to hear her perform in 1978 and she just blew me away. She was such a consummate performer and she brought all the elements of musical performance together–the way she moved on stage, the way she commanded the audience’s attention, the way she commanded her trio’s attention. She was really a complete musician and that left a deep impression on me. Then a few years later I got a recording of hers from 1970, her first record on her own label, and the sound of it just kind of stayed in my ears. So when I started my doctoral work and I was thinking about a topic for my Ph.D dissertation, writing about her came to mind. I did a paper about one of the songs that she did on the 1970 recording and compared her approach to the approach Billie Holiday uses, that was on a song called “I Didn’t Know What Time It Was,” and that was kind of the prototype for the dissertation. It brought in elements of the phonetic analysis I use. And also as I started preparing for my interview with Betty, it became clear to me that this was a remarkable person and a remarkable musician whose work had largely been neglected. She has only 20 commercial recordings to her name out of a 50-year career, and I was stunned to discover that. And there are other reasons. It turns out that Betty was partly responsible for that but I felt that she was under-recognized. When I was able to get a book contract for the research that I’d done I was really thrilled because it was giving me an opportunity to get the word out about her and her work.

Molly Sheridan: Yeah, I noticed that you did one-on-one interviews with her. What was your personal impression of her?

William Bauer: Tough lady, oh yeah. Tough, but also very warm at the same time, a bundle of energy, strong opinions, passionate, and also reserved on a certain level. So just very complex, you know, very rich and not easy to read.

Molly Sheridan: What were some of her strong opinions?

William Bauer: Well, I mean pretty much all of her opinions were strong, but just to give you an example, we were talking about Miles Davis and I mentioned something about his turning his back to the audience and how I thought that was sort of a gesture of disregard–that he didn’t want to stoop to being an entertainer. And she really rose to his defense and said that he wasn’t doing that he was just turning to interact with his other musicians, and I just thought that was interesting because she’s actually attacked Miles on other issues–his use of fusion and rock elements in his music. She’s gone on the record saying that he sold out and that he didn’t need to do that. Linda Prince wrote an article [for Down Beat] called “Bebopper Breathes Fire,” which really kind of captures this image of Betty reacting to Miles and so much else that was going on at the time. The thing is, she had a really tough time from the mid-’60s to the mid-’70s, so if you read interviews with her from that time you see them growing increasingly vitriolic and bitter about her lost opportunities. I think that the tone of the interviews is understandable given her life circumstances. Then after 1987 when she signed with Verve and ’89 when she won the Grammy award, the whole tone of her interviews is quite different and so I think a researcher has to keep that element in mind. You can’t just look at a life monolithically and not take into account the life circumstances that influence where an artist is in that life.

Molly Sheridan: Right. Do you think it was more society and the environment that she was working in that caused a lot of that or was it her personally?

William Bauer: What I try to get across in the book by laying out the whole picture is to make it clear that it was both at work at the same time, that really in all of our lives we have historical circumstances that we’re facing and then we have our own character that we bring to those circumstances. So here was Betty, a woman who was extremely willful and really defiant in many areas of her life, going right back to her relationship with her mother and unwilling to compromise about so much because she so strongly believed in her vision of what was to be. And then of course encountering this music industry that’s dominated by white men who expect a woman to basically go along with what they tell her to do because they know what’s best. They were also interested in marketing the music and selling it and making money from it, and so many artists are seduced by that because that’s how they make money too, but Betty was unwilling to be drawn into that whole discussion because she had made a decision that her dedication to the bebop ideal was paramount. And I believe that’s why she’s so deeply respected by the musicians.

Molly Sheridan: I want to switch gears a little bit and talk about her as a composer, and what place you think her original compositions will have in her legacy?

William Bauer: Hmm, that’s a very good question. I would say that one thing that needs to be taken into account is that we look at composition as a particular kind of activity, as somebody sitting down with manuscript paper and notating music that they’re hearing in their imaginations. And I think there’s a cultural bias there. That plays out in the jazz world, for example, because people like Ellington and Mingus and Monk, I think are viewed in a special light because they held positions as composers as well as improvisers. So one thing I guess I’m hoping to do in the book as well, although this is really subliminal almost, is to get people to think about what it means to be a composer in an African American sense of the word and to expand the definition of that term to include arranging, because some of Betty Carter’s arrangements are so far afield from the original raw materials that she’s working with that she’s working in quite a compositional way. I think this can also be looked at in light of the western tradition because you have Josquin Des Pres, for example, writing masses based on chant melodies, and in some ways you can look at those as arrangements–he’s taking a chant and creating an arrangements so that people can hear the chant tune in a particular way–but he’s bringing so much of himself to it that a shift has taken place away from the chant and towards Josquin himself. I would say the same happened with Betty. The problem is that she was doing this with pop tunes that people kind of wanted to hum along with. So here again she’s challenging people’s preconceptions and making it hard for them, you know. You have to work to follow her were she’s going to go. So in answer to you question, I think that her legacy is going to become clearer to us over time. I think as we move away from the old kind of crooner mentality about singers, perhaps we’ll be able to listen to what she’s done and not compare it so much to the original tune. Instead we’ll just hear her arrangements/improvisations as part of her creative legacy. That b
eing said I think that her compositions are very interesting and if I could have I would have gone even more deeply into that in the book. But I felt that what I really wanted to do is look at specific tunes as she evolved her concept of them over time. So for example the 1972 album that she did on her own label, The Betty Carter Album, has a lot of original material that she worked on with the help of Danny Mixon and there were just some really interesting songs, really interesting ways of thinking about her musical materials. And then the 1979 album, The Audience with Betty Carter, also has just wonderful re-shapings of ideas and approaches to the vocal art moving from recitative sort of singing to arioso into full fledged tunes. There’s one composition of hers that I don’t transcribe but I discuss in great depth, it’s called “Dropping Things,” and I think this tune gives you some window into the incredible musical imagination that she had and the incredible means that she had musically, because she’s working with a kind of modal concept, she’s not working in a straight ahead meter, and she’s also doing something with the musicians. The tune is sort of an A-A-B-A tune, but it’s not a 32-bar form, and the second time that she sings the A section, the bass player and the drummer kind of go crazy underneath her. They’re doing something totally different tempo-wise than what she and pianist are doing. And she described this rhythmic thing that she was experimenting with at the time as the wave. While I never really had the chance to ask her about this particular moment, I have a sense that that was one example of what she was trying to do. And she was able to have this disjunction, this rhythmic disjunction, because of the tune’s modal characteristic. It freed the musicians up. And most singers would just flip out if the bass player and drummer tried anything like that underneath her, but here’s Betty just riding the crest of the wave. (laughs) I love it.

Molly Sheridan: Do you think a lot of this was just her innate talent or did she have a mentor or work closely with the musicians themselves, because she didn’t have a lot of formal training. Is seems like she was working mainly off her experience as a performer?

William Bauer: Well, there again I think you have to look at the jazz world as being different than the European classical world. During the time that Betty was growing up, getting formal training in jazz was non-existent, and so she did have remarkable mentoring. She was able to hang out with a lot of the bebop players coming out in the Detroit scene, people like Barry Harris, who I think even then was beginning to get a reputation for being something of a professor and of course now he has a huge reputation in that area, just sharing his wisdom and his insight about jazz. Tommy Flanagan was there, players that we don’t even know about now like Leon Rice and Ted Sheely. So there was a sense of being part of a learning community and yet it was unspoken. There wasn’t a huge direct emphasis placed on that so it happened very organically. And then when she got into Lionel Hampton‘s band, she was the seat partner of Bobby Platter. Bobby was a great alto player and an arranger and composer himself. He taught Betty a lot about arranging–he taught her how to write out parts, he taught her how to score things without having to play them on a piano. She had received some piano training earlier. She didn’t get very far in terms of her proficiency, but she could play chords, she could comp for herself in a basic kind of way. So I would say that she had some innate skills but she was a worker. She worked incredibly hard at learning about music theory and arranging and composing, and she put all of those pieces together in her own inimitable way.

Molly Sheridan: This month, we’re asking several women jazz composers if they feel that their gender has influenced their music in any way. How do you think she might have answered that question?

William Bauer: Betty would probably say it has nothing to do with it. I think Betty wanted to operate in the world as though gender didn’t matter and as though race didn’t matter, that none of those factors should limit anyone’s opportunities, and that none of those factors should be used to determine the merits of somebody’s work. So I don’t think she would want her work to be heard as an expression of her womanhood. That’s my gut sense. She certainly didn’t think of herself as a feminist when feminism came in early on. But I think as the message of feminism sank in she started to realize that she had been doing feminism all her life. Later on in an interview with Graham Locke, she refers to her aggressiveness and she puts it in the context of a woman being allowed to be aggressive now. That she feels maybe more permission from society to be who she is. That being said, I think there are elements in her lyrics that probably reveal elements of her experience as a woman in the world. And I’m trying to think of a particular example, maybe her song “Thirty Years,” which looks at divorce, or an impending divorce, from the perspective of the woman who’s about to be left. It would be hard for me to imagine a man writing those lyrics.

Molly Sheridan: As you were doing the research for this book, I’m sure that you came across a lot of the history of women’s roles in jazz in general. Do you think there’s been enough documentation of their role in this world in terms of putting it down for posterity?

William Bauer: Hmm. That’s an interesting question. I guess I would have to skirt the question just by virtue of the fact that it seems to be kind of judging in a way and I generally try not to take that approach to history. What I would rather do is kind of turn the question around and say ‘Why hasn’t there been more documentation of women’s activity in jazz?’ Because then when we start to get to the question of why, then we can look to the future and see if we can’t improve the circumstances if they need to be improved. So there are definite reasons why women’s roles have not been very well documented and I think those reasons need to be brought out, but I also think that the sheer fact of women’s neglect in jazz history is a critical statement that needs to be acknowledged and addressed.

Molly Sheridan: Why do you feel women have been neglected?

William Bauer: Whew! Well that’s really a topic for a whole other interview by itself. That’s a huge, huge question. I don’t know if it comes across in the book. I just did a book signing in Detroit and Linda Yohn, who is the radio announcer for WEMU, said that she really appreciated the passages in which I wrote about Betty Carter’s apparel. She said, ‘I’m sure all the women who read your book will really appreciate that too.’ And I said to her that I really wanted as much as possible to try and enter into Betty Carter’s frame of reference and clearly her dress was very important to her, so for me to neglect writing about that I think would have been a serious omission as a scholar. So, I guess maybe that’s an indirect answer to you question. I think that it’s often hard for men to enter into women’s perspectives. And because men have typically been empowered by the institutions they’ve designed to write the histories, that pers
pective has not found a voice. But I think that as more and more women get involved in writing the histories, they’ll be able to reflect that perspective more effectively. I would like to think that as men become more enlightened about that perspective they too will be able to enter that frame of reference and view history and their lives from it.

Gender Blind to See More

Back in 1987, I was in The New York Public Library for the Performing Arts, researching the music of John J. Becker in the Americana Collection. It was by chance that I noticed, and then became immersed, in the work of the composer in the Collection who followed Becker alphabetically: Johanna Magdelena Beyer. Beyer had a catalog of over 50 manuscripts of works composed in the 1930s and ’40s, and the more I got to know them and put some of the pieces of her life together, the more I realized that here was a composer of great significance whose work had been completely neglected. In dating the works, their performance history, and the circle in which she interacted, it became clear that some of Beyer’s music predated and influenced work of John Cage, Henry Cowell, Lou Harrison, and others (all of whom were exposed to her music).

While Beyer died at the relatively young age of 55 in 1944, it seemed certain that her obscurity and lack of regard was also predominantly due to one factor: her gender. It was terribly poignant to me that she signed her scores, as well as letters she wrote to conductors and other performers, “J.M. Beyer.”

Is the fate Johanna Beyer suffered a thing of the past? I know that as a presenter, even ten years ago, I was very conscious of programming the music of women; attention was paid to ensure it happened, and all involved made certain to point this out to audience and grantmakers. It was not unusual to see, on occasion, a concert billed as “music by women composers.” Perhaps this was a byproduct of the political correctness of the ’80s and ’90s, and the sense that everyone and everything needed to have labels of origin attached. Perhaps we needed that self-consciousness to progress to a place where new habits could emerge.

Today, I hardly think about gender as I select works for presentation, and as I look at the music I’ve conducted or programmed in the past year, much of it happens to be by women. My sense is that my obliviousness to the composer’s sex is an indication of a very positive shift. It just so happens that much of the wonderful music being written today is by women, and gentlemen, they have us surrounded!

Nevertheless, I know that gender-blind equality is probably a fantasy in this culture. There are young women today who do not know what the ERA is. As the father of two young daughters, I am already fighting equal rights battles on their behalf, if only on the playground. And yet like any proud daddy, I want every opportunity for them to succeed—to be able to take their aspirations to places J.M. Beyer couldn’t.

Ladies and gentlemen, how does today’s climate of equality feel to you? And what can we do as musicians to help stimulate a sense of greater equality in our culture as a whole?

How does gender affect your music?

Katharine CartwrightKatharine Cartwright
“In the jazz profession, I’m constantly reminded that I’m a woman and a singer, for better or worse. It’s certainly not the only thing, nor is it the most important thing. It’s simply there. It can be fun, or it can be a drag. So, in my art, I try to have some fun with it…”
Jane Ira BloomJane Ira Bloom
“I became a composer because it was as natural as breathing to me from the start but also because as far as I could see then the male-dominated jazz world didn’t embrace women instrumentalists as collaborators…”
Nora YorkNora York
“I am a singer first—then a composer. Singing is the direct and immediate expression of my experience. My voice finds form inside my body, so, at that fundamental level, gender forms my music…”
Ursel SchlichtUrsel Schlicht
“The concept of a mainstream seems to shift towards a multitude of musical expression, reflecting today’s broader understanding of gender. We have moved from the classic dichotomy of maleness and femaleness towards a variety of ways women and men identify with gender…”
Jamie BaumJamie Baum
“There have always been questions regarding the experience and difficulties of being a woman in the jazz profession, but not about the ways gender might affect my compositional style. I hadn’t thought much about it…”
John MustoAmina Claudine Myers
“Gender doesn’t have anything to do with my compositions. Well, not that I know of. My music comes from how I see my life, how I see other people, nature, my experiences, things that I see and think about. You could be either male or female to do it that way…”

Sophisticated Ladies

From our beginnings on the Web more than three years ago, NewMusicBox has always made a conscious effort to include women’s voices along with men’s voices in every issue. Critics might claim this is some kind of quota system, but our balance is a pretty accurate reflection of the new music community in the country overall. Since the question of gender balance has been a hot topic on our interactive forums, we thought it would be exciting to explore the impact of gender in jazz, an area of the music world where there seem to be even more bridges left to cross than in many other areas. After her provocative investigative report for the Village Voice about the lack of women musicians involved with Jazz @ Lincoln Center which inspired a protest rally outside Lincoln Center, and her New York Times Arts & Leisure feature about Abbey Lincoln, Lara Pellegrinelli seemed a natural choice to serve as our guest editor; NewMusicBox regulars will remember her elaborate guided tour of great American jazz clubs. A Ph.D. candidate in ethnomusicology at Harvard University, Ms. Pellegrinelli combines her dissertation research on contemporary jazz vocalists with assignments for a variety of publications including Ms. magazine, Jazz Times, Jazziz, Down Beat, and the New Grove Dictionary of Jazz.

– FJO


Lara Pellegrinelli
Guest Editor Lara Pellegrinelli
Photo by Melissa Richard

When Frank J. Oteri invited me to guest edit this month’s NewMusicBox, we were enjoying large plates of pierogies at Kiev in the East Village with mutual friends. He had asked me whom I was writing about these days and I made a bold statement of it: Abbey Lincoln, I told him, the most important woman in jazz. Period. Frank put down his fork and pricked up his ears.

Certainly, I am not the first to recognize Lincoln’s significance. Since her “comeback” in the early 1990s—in part a result of her signing with Verve—critics have hailed her as one of the finest vocalists in jazz. For the many who feel a rather morbid compulsion to assign the title of “greatest living jazz vocalist,” Lincoln has become that leading lady, a mantle passed down from deceased legends beginning with Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald, and Sarah Vaughan through Carmen McRae and Betty Carter.

Although she is a supremely gifted performer, Lincoln’s greatest accomplishment—to my mind and ears—lies in the arena of songwriting. As vocalist Cassandra Wilson so aptly put it: “[Lincoln’s] importance goes beyond technical achievements. She’s a culture bearer. She represents a metamorphosis from singer as ëaccessory’ to singer as creator.”

So, too, does Carter; she had written a portion of her own material and led her own bands for decades, an unusual feat for a vocalist and one that has posed challenges for women in jazz generally speaking. For Carter, the singer’s role would approximate that of the instrumental soloist. By contrast, Lincoln has reclaimed a distinctive tradition of song. She is a brilliant storyteller. Moreover, her lyrics counter the sexism and dated gender roles common throughout the popular songbook.

Frank and I determined that we would build an issue focusing on the “jazz” tradition (a label, it should be mentioned, that Lincoln rejects) and women as composers. Lincoln, clearly, would be our “In the First Person” protagonist. Linda Dahl, author of Stormy Weather: The Music and Lives of a Century of Jazz Women and, most recently, Morning Glory: A Biography of Mary Lou Williams, enlisted as our “In The Third Person” HyperHERstorian; she provides us with snapshots of women as composers throughout jazz history.

For “Hymn and Fuguing Tune,” we tackled a seemingly obvious, but infrequently asked question: “Does gender have an influence on your compositions and, if so, how?” Jane Ira Bloom, Amina Claudine Myers, Nora York, Jamie Baum, Katharine Cartwright, and Ursel Schlict went to bat. We invite you to comment on how you feel gender affects composing, performing, and listening by posting to In the Second Person.

Our “In Print” section offers selections from William R. Bauer’s Open the Door: The Life and Music of Betty Carter, published earlier this spring. SoundTracks provides details and soundclips from 48 new recordings featuring new American music, 13 this month by women jazzers. News features and Hear&Now concert listings are updated daily, so stop by again soon!

I have one parting thought as a woman who writes about jazz: I generally find myself critical of the segregated “women’s issues” produced by various magazines, ones I fear may ghettoize women musicians. That is certainly not the intent here. In a tradition where women have suffered many stumbling blocks, ones that have often gone unspoken, I do feel that it is vital to both air and address them. But, with equal importance, we must get beyond prejudice and find ways that give voice to the different perspectives of women in music. Frank J. Oteri has actively encouraged diversity within the regular framework of NewMusicBox, proving that all are welcome. I hope that those of you who are new readers this month will visit again and take advantage of this unique resource.