Category: Analysis

I Am A Composer

Pre-ramble

name
Gail Wein having compositional thoughts during last year’s ACO “Compose Yourself” class; photo courtesy American Composers Orchestra

I was seven or eight the first time I sketched out a theme on staff paper so I could play it on my clarinet, the instrument I began on before I “graduated” to playing bassoon. It was the Nestle’s Chocolate theme, and my big sister had to show me how to fill out the last measure with quarter rests. Years later I arranged a piece for my high school woodwind quintet—maybe it was even an original theme. For some reason, I thought parallel 5ths would be a good idea. Not so, as I found out in freshman counterpoint class in college (and as the playback confirmed).

Then, I married a composer. I thought that would be as close to writing music as I’d ever get (and no, you haven’t heard of him, and we parted ways years ago).

He seemed awfully nervous when I started getting interested in composing. How hard could it be, after all? Some tools, some ideas, and some paper. Luckily for him, I never found the time between my job as a computer programmer, my avocation as a bassoonist in community orchestras, and my contemporary music radio show. That was about 20 years ago, and for the most part I forgot about the ambition to compose. Then, last spring I heard about the “Compose Yourself” class offered by the American Composers Orchestra—five sessions during which you would learn about composition from the likes of John Corigliano, Tania Leon, Michael Torke, Derek Bermel, Robert Beaser—pretty much some of the best composers in the United States. I was immediately intrigued, and I signed up. This was an experience I could not pass up.

Even as I was signing up for the course, I wasn’t sure it was because I want to compose. Now that I live in New York City, I try to go to at least one concert every day. It’s so easy here. There are scads of choices spanning the big halls like Carnegie, the medium sized places like Symphony Space, and the smaller and less traditional venues like Le Poisson Rouge. On top of that, there are the various noontime weekday concerts, which are all free.

But I digress. The point is, I hear a lot of music, and a lot of that is new music. And I sometimes write about it for various publications. So I thought this would be a great opportunity to get inside the composer’s head, to understand more of the process and therefore have more insight into the music.

As the day of the first class approached, I got a little anxious. Would I be expected to actually write some music? After all, at the final class, ACO musicians were going to be on hand to play some of the new compositions. And how could I possibly pull something (music) out of nothing (thin air)?

 

Session I: Focus on Strings

The first class is about to begin, and I’m glad they’re holding the sessions at WNYC, the public radio station. This is a place that is reeking with creativity, even in our non-descript conference room. Audio production, something I’ve done a fair amount of throughout my radio career, is quite a bit like composition; putting together sound clips rather than notes.

I arrive pretty early, and as the students trickle in, I notice that some are older than me, some younger, and it is about half and half on the gender mix. Pretty much a cross-section of the people I see at some of the concerts I go to. Based on the introductions, it seems that several are already composers: two of our classmates work in the commercial music business, and most of the others have tried their hand at it one way or another. I’m consciously trying not to be intimidated.

name
Derek Bermel gets animated during the “Compose Yourself” class; photo courtesy American Composers Orchestra

Between Derek Bermel’s comments about the composition process, American composers, and orchestration books, ACO assistant concertmaster Bob Chausow’s detailed demonstrations of the violin, and the composer Michael Torke’s drop-the-needle discussion of compositional techniques, it seemed like every sentence has contained an eye-opening revelation.

For instance, did you know that some composers learn by copying over the score of a master’s work? That it really does matter what key a piece is in, beyond temperament and tessitura concepts? That D Major is a great key for violin, in part because of where the open strings fall? I didn’t.

Being a non-string player, some of the most basic facts are revelatory. For instance, the range of the violin can be extended using harmonics, but those notes have a different tone color. These harmonics work best on the lower strings. The notation is Greek to me – and it actually looks like Greek, which I don’t understand, either. I knew about upbows and downbows, but not about sul ponticello, col legno, or con sordini (that last one is “with a mute”).

When it’s Michael Torke’s turn to talk, my eyes continue to bug out of my head. Repetition is one of the most useful compositional tools, he tells us, demonstrating with his work Atop the Eiffel Tower. It builds beauty, structure, and meaning. And then he talks about a concept that’s the most mind-blowing of all to me, to somehow use momentum to create a feeling of inevitability: the next note comes naturally out of the previous passage, as a piece of music unfolds organically.

At the end, we stumble out of the meeting room, most of us dazzled and astonished by what we have learned and have been exposed to in two short hours.

A couple of weeks later, at a concert of new music by younger composers, I am ultra-critical of most of the works. Doesn’t anyone learn—or use—form anymore? Why can’t they find a way to make their work more interesting? And then I realize that I don’t have the chops to write anything close to even the worst piece on the program. And the piece I like most—a cello concerto—makes me think twice about my own choice to write for the cello. There’s so much to know, and so many great sounds that I have no idea how to tell a musician how to make.

 

Session Two: Focus on Woodwinds

name
Robert Beaser presides over a pensive moment during the “Compose Yourself” class; photo courtesy American Composers Orchestra

Attrition has reduced our class size from about 15 to 10. That’s okay; there’s more space in our snug conference room. The variety of snacks has diminished to paper cups full of microwave popcorn. Our topic tonight is woodwinds, and it’s a bassoonist that comes to demonstrate. I’m a little disappointed, because I would have liked to get to know a new instrument. I am quite relieved, however, to NOT have any revelations during his demo.

The following day, I’m at a George Wein (who is likely a distant relative) and Friends concert at Zankel Hall, listening to Warren Vache playing a lovely trumpet solo, with his golden, clear tone. As he intones the first notes of the phrase and melody, I think about the difference between songwriting and classical composition. Certainly they are different, yes. But how and why? Which is harder? And what about improvising, which is sort of composing on the spot. I think Paul McCartney is one of the most brilliant songwriters who ever lived, but to me his classical compositions lack depth. They have a two-dimensional character. Many classical composers draw on folk melodies, scales, and traditional material. What about something else? “Oh Lady Be Good” was one of the first tunes I learned—or tried to learn—to play jazz bassoon. (The other was “There Will Never Be Another You”; I only really learned two.) What if I tried to take that tune, or a fragment thereof, and write a melody around it?

The ensemble is playing Mood Indigo now—three B-flat clarinets all in low register, a really dusky, earthy sound. And now I understand that the register one writes in can make all the difference. The soloists now move into the middle and high register. I’ve not paid attention before now to how much difference register can make in the sound of a piece.

 

Later in the week, I’m listening to the Klangforum Wien play a trio by Enno Poppe called Trauben. I watch the violinist counting intensely. Do I have to make my piece rhythmically complex? I really love music in triple meter; I am a sucker for 6/8 time. Why write something if I don’t intend for it to be my favorite piece. Right? That doesn’t mean it has to be beautiful, just that I have to love it. So, it has to sound good to me.

What about audience environment? I love this concert and the other offerings at the Austrian Cultural Forum, but the chairs are so damn uncomfortable to sit in. Could it be part of the composer’s responsibility to contribute to the concert environment? Maybe I’d give everyone a pillow. Or earplugs. Or—hey!—eyeshades for an enhanced aural experience. How ’bout that?

 

Session Three: Focus on Brass

The world’s greatest procrastinator, I had decided that I needed to write at least a little bit before tonight’s class. How to begin, technically, logistically? I don’t have a piano or a keyboard. My bassoon has been in the closet so long I know taking it out will bring up so many other issues that I’d be completely distracted from the actual composition process.

There’s got to be some kind of shareware I can download to just get started, mostly to hear the playback. I know Finale and Sibelius are the industry standards, but I’m just not ready for that. I grab a demo version of some no-name software, download it, enter a few notes and figure out how to hear the playback.

I’m surprised that I write more than one measure. I actually put down two phrases, like an a and a b. I’m not sure I am entirely happy with them, but it’s time to move on to the rest of my day. I feel very satisfied that I have actually begun. Frankly, I had felt somewhat frozen by an unnamed fear of putting down my very first notes on paper.

Tania León is the guest composer at tonight’s class. She’s one of my favorites, both as a person and as a composer, so I’m disappointed when she has to rush in and rush out, hurrying to get to a dinner meeting. She plows through a couple of her pieces, and we follow along in the score as the recordings play. With this, she demonstrates the importance of “white space,” unpredictability and the element of surprise, and her use of poly-rhythms to bring the ensemble together in her piece Inura

After Tania’s whirlwind tour of her compositional process, we have our brass lesson. Derek had promised us that, no matter what instrument we intended to write for, we would want to switch to French horn after hearing Danielle Rose’s demonstration. And I have to say, he was right (though I did not actually change my own composition). It’s pretty amazing what you can do with the horn, via the overtone series, and quite impressive to watch Danielle play about four octaves of arpeggios by changing only her embouchure. The whole “horn in F” topic proves pretty confusing—if your piece is in C, do you write it in F for the horn? Or does it just sound like it’s in F? That will probably become very (painfully) clear when I sit down to actually write for horn and another instrument.

It’s three days later, and Lyn Liston, the coordinator of the ACO “Compose Yourself” program emails to let us know that we are to submit our compositions to Derek by May 1 in order to have it performed at our last class two weeks later. I immediately shoot back a note complaining that she has effectively moved my deadline up by two weeks. Since I planned to only finish the composition with a gun to my head (i.e., the deadline), I feel the figurative trigger click near my ear.

 

Session Four: Focus on Percussion

Jim Preiss gives us our percussion instruction in class tonight. “Less is more,” he urges, and shows us all manner of percussion instruments, techniques, and notation. I think notation will be the hardest part, as it’s so foreign to everything else I’ve experienced in music. I’m quite fascinated by all the different ways one can play something as simple as a triangle. Jim mentions that percussionists call some of their implements “toys”… but that we should not!

John Corigliano is today’s guest composer. He tells us he thinks of percussion as the “spice rack” of the orchestra. His compositional philosophy is similar to that of a sculptor: “The piece is the piece—you work inward till you find the notes.” He shows us how he constructs a piece from the top down, beginning with an enormous architectural sketch depicting the shape of the entire piece. It looks a bit like a landscape of mountains. In it, he’s indicated various intensities and peaks in the music. He starts there and works inward to the details of the piece.

I find the radically different approaches that composers take particularly fascinating. I had a long talk with Joan Tower recently about her compositional process, and it’s essentially the opposite: She begins with a single note, explores where it goes, and builds the piece up and around from there. It reminds me of my days as a computer programmer; there is “top down programming” and “bottom up programming”. It is essentially the same concept, but uses completely different sides of the brain.

When I tried to put my first notes on paper two weeks ago, my first question for myself was, “How to begin?” Am I a top-down composer, thinking of overall form first; or am I a bottom-up composer, starting with one note or theme or idea and working it out to see what it becomes. I had decided I’m top-down, and I tried to notate one of the melodies that had been rolling around in my head. The first thing I noticed was that it had been a quarter-century since I’d taken an ear-training course, and what I notated didn’t match what was in my head. Even moving those notes up and down by half-steps didn’t resolve that. I decided that either my head is out of tune, or I’m in a microtonal world. I decided against microtonality for this first attempt, so I compromised with getting notes from my inner-ear to the page.

Then I left for a week and a half of travel. Though I had my laptop with me the entire time, I predictably avoided the task entirely. When I return home, however, resolved that there is really nothing stopping me from actually composing, I sit down at 11 p.m. and somewhat miraculously come up with a few more measures to add to the paltry six I had written almost a month ago. Hmmm. Looks a little short. Since I seem to have two different sections, I decide to repeat the first section for a classic A-B-A form. Thirty-six measures, one solo cello. Is it enough? I decide it is, for my first attempt. At 2:15 a.m., I submit the piece by email. I also send it along to a couple of my composer friends.

name

Less than ten hours later, Derek phones me. It’s a good piece, he assures me. Is it really my first? A few technical tweaks later, and the final copy is ready to go. Margaret Brouwer emails me. She likes my piece, too, and compliments me on my use of rhythm and pitch. I waver between feeling proud of myself and feeling catered to by my friends and colleagues.

I am a composer! I think I can say that after having written one piece.

In the wake of my actually completing my first composition, I attend an Orpheus Chamber Orchestra concert. Listening to Rorem and Stravinsky, I reflect on why Stravinsky sounds like Stravinsky, whether it’s Pulcinella or L’Histoire or Firebird. I feel like I now have a bit more insight into this question, though I am still not quite able to articulate it. The Rorem songs strike me as having an “American” style, and I reflect on why I think this is so. This particular cycle is reminiscent of both John Harbison’s Mirabai Songs and Samuel Barber’s Knoxville Summer, 1915. It seems to be beyond classroom analysis for me.

 

Session Five: Performance

The moment of truth! It’s the final class, the one during which our pieces are to be performed by members of the ACO. Just like a “real” concert, there is a printed program, and I have to say it’s a real thrill to see my name in print as a composer. I am kind of sorry that I titled my piece so frivolously: Diddles. I can’t help thinking that my composition is the moral equivalent of “Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star,” so simple as to be trivial.

My piece comes about halfway through the program; eighth out of 13. While I’m listening to the performances of my classmates’ work, I am experiencing a mix of emotions. On the one hand, I am so anxious about the impending performance of my masterwork—and so flummoxed after hearing it—that it’s hard to register my feelings about the other music. And on the other hand, I’m impressed to the point of intimidation about how accomplished the other students seem to be as composers, and how good their music sounds. Nine chose to write for more than one instrument, and I am impressed all over again by those who dared to traverse into that additional dimension of composition.

During the performance, considerations came up that we, as new composers, never thought about, e.g. where the musicians would need to breathe and, in my case, tempo and articulation. Many notational issues that we take for granted are not to be assumed. It was also interesting to see how the players interpret what’s not specifically notated, like articulation, fermatas, tempi, and phrasing. Now I truly understand so much more about how much a given performance of the same piece can vary, depending on the interpretations of the performers. When ACO’s cellist began to play Diddles—much too slowly—it did not occur to me to stop him and ask him to do it in the tempo that I had imagined it. In retrospect, I am a little horrified that I had overlooked such a crucial and now obvious element: notating the tempo. Over the entire 36 measures of the piece, I kept thinking about how his performance didn’t sound like cheap electronic software playback that I used at home. Was it better or worse? I can’t say for sure; my memory is clouded by the fact that I felt slightly embarrassed at the public display of my creativity, and I was anxious for it to be over.

Before each of our pieces was performed, we had a chance to get up and say something about the piece. My comments focused on the process, and the unexpected fear that surrounded it. I also touched on how similar it was to the experience of writing an article – the foot-dragging, procrastination, delay, and ultimate delight in actually creating something and completing it. Ironically, the person whose piece was performed right after mine stood up and said, “I had some things I was going to say about my piece, but Gail just said everything that I was about to tell you.” Wow! It was surprising and somewhat comforting to know that I was not alone.

*

Now, nearly a year after the first meeting of “Compose Yourself,” I still think about the experience. From time to time, I run into a few of the classmates of mine who had similar backgrounds, and we always have the same conversation. “Have you written anything since the course?” they ask. No is usually the answer. It was more about the learning experience than about actually writing music, we both agree.

On the other hand, when I am surrounded by composers, which I often am at many of the new music concerts that I take in, I smile and chime in, “I’m a composer, too.” And then I laugh, because 36 measures of Diddles for solo cello hardly puts me in the same league as Mozart, Mahler, or Moravec.

***

name
Gail Wein

Gail Wein is a New York-based music journalist and media consultant. Her writing credits include articles for the Washington Post, Symphony magazine, Playbill, Musical America and NewMusicBox, broadcast features on National Public Radio, and CD booklet notes for Joan Tower’s triple Grammy Award-winning Made in America on Naxos American Classics. Ms. Wein’s diverse career path runs the gamut from producer for NPR’s Performance Today and general manager of the contemporary chamber ensemble Voices of Change to stints as a computer programmer and an actuary.

The Economy of Exposure: Publicity as Payment?

Few things are more valuable to the careers of composers and performers than the sonic proof of our inspiration’s existence. We spend a great deal of time and money producing high quality recordings of our music. We must. They are our artistic legacy, and our best promotional tool. Yet in this digital age, these recordings, regardless of how precious they are to us or how much we’ve invested in musicians, engineers, and studio time to create them, are no longer especially financially remunerative. The millionth copy is virtually identical to the master file, and as either physical objects, or endlessly duplicable audio tracks, these recordings have little intrinsic worth.

But there does exist something uniquely valuable and not reproducible: the artists themselves. This is particularly true for any performer, because nothing can duplicate the experience of a live concert: feeling the sound waves travel though physical air to your body, seeing the interplay between the musicians, and watching beads of sweat flung sensuously off the brow of a beautiful performer while hoping she’ll have an unexpected wardrobe malfunction and bare all at the height of the cadenza’s crescendo. Oh yes, live concerts are unrivaled. But this uniqueness is also the case for those of us who are not performers, because we can find ways to interact with our fans and clients, offering a value-added aspect to what we do (usually with our clothes on). If something can’t be digitized and widely distributed, it remains special. That, in turn, is worth far more than an iTunes download or a (soon to be obsolete) CD.

The New Sonic Paradigm

This is an era in which artists must evaluate each of their creations with a heightened awareness of how the public will experience it. Years ago we listened to scratchy LPs, much of the time hearing Side A in its entirety and, after expending some physical effort to put down the beer and walk across the room to flip the record, then enjoying Side B. Recording standards were not examined under today’s digital microscope, and the order of tracks mattered a great deal as they took the listener on a carefully planned journey. Today’s journey through individual digital files is as likely to take listeners from our track to the second movement of a Brahms trio to the beginning of some West African drumming, until they suddenly click over to U2’s latest hit. And like it or not, unless we’re doing a low-fidelity bedroom podcast for raw promotional purposes, our track needs to sound as well mixed and mastered as U2’s, in this new world of instant comparative listening.

Along with the expectation of higher production values, the way people hear has also been significantly affected by the way they see what they’re hearing. Most of us spend many hours peering at video monitors stimulating our eyes with brightly lit content from computers, mobile devices, and televisions. Audience’s brains have been trained to expect something to see, and music artists know that pairing their work with video may not only enhance live performances, but will give them further exposure on YouTube and social networking platforms that will in turn broaden their concert attendance.

Is It Theft or Promotion?

On one hand, technology has given artists welcome control over their product and their careers. On the other hand, it has taken much of the control away and granted it to the user. One gain and loss of control is over the distribution of our work. We have the tools to bring anything we do to anyone within reach of a computer. Conversely, anyone within reach of a computer can choose to make a digital copy of our work—including that for which we expect to be paid— and upload it to a server from which an endless parade of visitors can choose to download our music for free.

There is no preventing digital piracy if the culprits are ripping tracks off of commercially released discs. But one way to thwart theft and wrest at least some control over the free distribution of our work, is that when we are the ones posting our music to our website, blog, and social networking presences, we are best protected if we only upload lower quality MP3 excerpts of our pieces, rather than full-length, uncompressed tracks. Sure, these short clips of our music will show up on many free MP3 download sites hosted on servers around the world. But the people grabbing the illegal downloads will be disappointed once they hear what they’ve got, since just as the music gets interesting, it fades out. Other download sites simply link back to the artist’s own server, in which case they act as a free promotional tool, since the artist posted the files themselves with the expectation of people hearing them.

name

If someone is determined to download music for free, they will find a way. They cannot be stopped. Complaining to the owners of the illegal sites, or placing an anti-theft notice on ours (apart from a general copyright indication) will rarely get us anywhere, as the perpetrators are unlikely to respond with cookies and a friendly apology. This is illegal behavior that we simply cannot control. It is global and currently not policeable. But in the spirit of making lemonade out of lemons, there is much we can do to exploit the very act of being exploited, and can in fact benefit by taking an entrepreneurial attitude.

The Economy of Exposure

We’ve entered an entirely new paradigm, in which it is not only money but distribution that is the payment which leads to…money. I’ve coined this phenomenon “the economy of exposure.” I’ve come to view freebies—be they my own offerings or, more often, the unintentional ones taken from my server or others and proffered by the gazillions of MP3 download sites out there—as promotion. I treat these instances of unexpected charity as part of my advertising expenses. Department stores have what they refer to as “loss leaders”: items that they sell at cost or less, in order to get shoppers in the door and, usually, buying other things as well. Since I receive my commissions from the act of people hearing my music, I need the advertising! All it takes is someone hearing a few clips of my work and loving it, to lead to them giving me thousands of dollars to compose a new piece. If they hear my music via an illegal site, it ultimately doesn’t matter if I can then say a new commission was the end result. Two of my most recent five-figure commissions have come from the web, out of the blue through my MySpace page, from people who had never met me nor bought a CD of my music. I posted only excerpts of my work, but I posted them in as many places as I could, where people could hear them free of charge. The response has been as effective for me as any promotional campaign.

A sense of perspective is important. In the concert music world, the uncomfortable concept of file sharing is easier to absorb because our sales numbers are so much smaller than those common in the commercial pop music realm. I would not be as relaxed in my attitude were I making my living in that field. But in my case as a composer in a genre that, optimistically, represents three percent of the market, I just can’t tremble at the thought of people…uh, all eleven of them… stealing my music for contrabass flute or bassoon duo. Nonetheless, I sell my music aggressively on my own sites and through many distributors and record companies, and almost never give anything away, so if something slips through the cracks in my happy little micro-cache of music that the vast majority of the population doesn’t care about to begin with, well then, perhaps that will do me some good and create some new fans who are then willing to pay for more. The economy of exposure, without the wardrobe malfunction!

Speaking as a composer, publisher, and owner of many copyrights, let me be clear: the fact that the world’s new digital paradigm often results in unauthorized uses of intellectual property does not mean that those uses are acceptable. They are a symptom of a problem that needs fixing. Just like electricians, teachers, and attorneys, artists must be paid for their professional efforts; their copyrights must be honored. Likewise, just because we now have the tools to engage in a manner of digital bartering whereby we benefit from viral networking, in no way does that negate the importance of also being paid real money for the real work we do. I view the two aspects of payment as working seamlessly with each other, not against each other.

I am keenly aware of the new world in which we operate, and believe that every artist should be encouraged to examine this rapidly evolving frontier of art, commerce, and technology, and their place in such an unfamiliar landscape. To best protect ourselves we must absorb the truths of how things are, and not allow our thinking to be clouded by how we think things should be. If we do not view a problem from all possible angles—including those that uncomfortably contort our beliefs—then we only do ourselves a disservice.

Mash-Ups and Downs

The work of a remix artist from Israel named Kutiman offers a fascinating example for this “economy of exposure” concept. Kutiman chooses videos others have uploaded onto YouTube and creates new pieces of art with them. Juxtaposing the offerings of music-makers around the world who have neither met nor tuned their instruments together, he makes an additive recipe that can be quite compelling in its unexpected grace. It’s interesting to use one of Kutiman’s videos titled “I’m New” as an example of the new digital paradigm, because it blurs the contextual distinction between the amateur and the professional, and deeply challenges our assumptions of copyright.

Kutiman’s video mash-ups are filled with fresh faces, open to the world, wanting very much to share their talent and appearing eager to please. Just like me, on my MyFace and SpaceBook pages. Except in this case, probably also a bit unlike me: I’ll assume for the sake of argument that most of these art-makers do not make a living from their art. At least, not yet. Some may in the near future, while others…well…probably not. Regardless of professional aspirations, however, they each took the initiative to post their videos and share something that mattered to them with complete strangers. But they did not have a proactive hand in ending up as part of Kutiman’s art. He happened upon them, and happened to them.

And by happening to them with a multimedia vehicle that viewers enjoy (his video mash-ups, which are as much about the visuals as they are about the music he derives from these sources), and most significantly, by including links to each one of these amateurs’ YouTube pages, Kutiman set the laws of viral marketing in motion for them all.

Take one person in the credits: Elexis Trinity. She has gone from being relatively unknown to having almost 70,000 YouTube views of her video, and over 200 very encouraging and complimentary comments posted underneath it. By the time you finish reading this sentence, those numbers will be even greater. (As of April 2016, that number has indeed increased, to nearly 1.5 million views.) Not only is this an inspiring example of how the web works at its best, but if Ms. Trinity can figure out how to use this platform to interact with her new fans, and if she devotes the necessary effort to following up on this unexpected break, paying opportunities may very well arise for her if that’s what she seeks.

In the view of copyright, Kutiman is using material he does not own, using it without explicit permission, and using it without paying for it. Instead, he offers his human source material the carrot of 15 seconds of e-fame. I am assuming that he is not making money directly from these creations (I see no ads), but that premise is a slippery slope, if indeed exposure is the new economy. Just as his work provides his sources a springboard from the dry land of anonymity into the inviting pool of recognition, so it provides for him, as well.

Kutiman makes it clear on his site that should anyone ever request to be removed from his artwork, he would oblige (no doubt, while gritting his teeth and thinking of all the work he will have to do to fill the slot with another suitable video in order to preserve the creation). His site includes a disclaimer that reads:

“THROUGH-YOU IS A VENUE FOR MUSIC AND ART APPRECIATION. THE VIDEOS AND MUSIC IS [sic] SHARED OUT OF LOVE AND RESPECT, AND IS ONLY MEANT TO HELP EXPOSE AND PROMOTE THE FEATURED ARTISTS. IF YOU WISH TO REMOVE OR HAVE CONCERNS, QUESTIONS, THOUGHTS, OR IDEAS PLEASE EMAIL US.”

So Kutiman’s sources are tacitly agreeing to have their material used without remuneration. Some may not care one way or the other, because they’re quite happy with their job as a dental technician, thank you very much. But surely, a few others may well see this as a potential big break that could launch a professional career.

The Freedom to Expose Yourself

It’s easy to be conflicted about the attractiveness of viral marketing vs. the serious ramifications of unlawful use of copyrighted material. In this Kutiman mash-up scenario, no money is exchanging hands, but the artist is crediting his sources, giving them as much of a chance to be discovered as he gives himself. And yet in the eyes of the law, Kutiman is considered a digital thief. It can be argued, however, that Kutiman is operating on a traditional barter system of sorts: in exchange for the material, he pays with the currency of global exposure. This, I must tell you, can be powerful compensation even in the worst recession. As a professional composer with a noticeable web presence, I experience the positive reality of this kind of economy every single day. It works.

On one hand, when anyone tells an artist that doing something for free is an “opportunity,” it smacks of the same insult as when a gigging musician is asked to play a wedding gratis and is baited with the “there will be some important people at the function who could be good for your career” line. Yech. Yet we all know that there is also some truth to this: 80 percent of success is just showing up, as Woody Allen is credited with saying. As for the other twenty percent? We’d like to think it’s mainly talent, but it’s probably…a lot of pure luck.

The point that many among us discussing the future of intellectual property and artists’ livelihoods are making is that no longer is the specific creative product the thing with intrinsic worth. It is not. What is of worth is the buzz, the vibe, the doing of the art and the collecting of the fans who dig our doing of it. What is of worth is the person doing it. I can speak to all this directly: my web presence, which offers a good glimpse of my personality, is my largest portal of income. It makes me and my work available 24/7 to people around the world who broadcast, perform, and record my music, purchase my scores and CDs, and yes, commission me. I spend a fair amount of time speaking around the country and encouraging my peers to take a page from my e-book, because I believe in the power these new tools directly give artists.

So what am I doing to achieve this positive result? The exact same thing that the YouTube amateurs featured in Kutiman’s videos have done: I posted material for the world to stumble upon. For free. In my case, excerpts of my music rather than entire tracks, but the upshot is the same. And just like the amateurs, I am ever hopeful that just maybe, someone will like me.

Amateurs and professionals are using the new tools the same way. Neither group needs to be vetted by PR agents or record company gatekeepers. Pro or non-pro, we have a similar probability of experiencing positive results. The difference, whether we are raw or honed at our craft, lies in the experience we are offering. But each one of us has the chance to find a unique fan base that resonates with what we do. This is why the concept of net neutrality and an open and accessible internet is so crucial to artists: equal access gives us complete access. It allows us to compete with anyone, be they an amateur, an indie artist, or a mega-company. I find this exciting and a very good thing for art in general. The more people who are able to create and share, the better for art. And the better for society’s aesthetic health.

Taking and Giving Control

Many of us who are creators of music, visual art, writings, and other contributions to society create as professionals, with an eye to earning money from our efforts. In some cases, that money is the bulk of our income. We are deeply invested in the current system of ownership and remuneration because we either already benefit from it, or eagerly hope to. We believe that what we create has worth, and is worth others paying for in order to experience. The concept of copyright matters very much.

However, a static interpretation of copyright as it pertained to creators before the digital age is a vestige of a previous era in which the end result of our creation—and in this case, we are talking about recorded media—was unique. It is no longer unique. But take heart, and remember that there is something unique we offer: ourselves.

We may think that we’re in the music-making business, but ultimately—if we intend to make money from our art—we are in the relationship-making business. This has been a truth since the first artist ever sought the first paying patron. Now this truth is under a bright spotlight, brought to the fore by the advent of digital media. Our recordings and videos are advertisements for us, because we are the product. The tail is wagging the dog. Take a moment and feel your brain squirm as it tries to process this. Then take a deep breath, and know that to be able to reach the world with a single click of a “send” or “upload” button is a very wonderful thing. And that yes, it can directly lead to real income.

Look around at the new technologies. Physical CDs, and perhaps books as well, will eventually become obsolete as internet speeds increase and connection points become ubiquitous, accessing media that easily streams. Landlines will soon be nonexistent because everyone will use cell phones. Laptops will become irrelevant because the cell phone/PDA/MP3 player device in your hand will do everything your computer can. Already, to many people email is quaint, because they’re instantly sharing information on a mobile platform in 140-character increments via Twitter. And all of this just captures the trends of this moment. In another year or two these tools, too, will be quaint, replaced by new and different ones.

Copyright distinctions are blurred to the extreme because everything is published. Everything, from your cute kitty pix to your third symphony. And if it’s floating out there in any digitized form, it is instantly obtainable by anyone in the world, 24/7, as fodder for his or her next mash-up or to be enjoyed, unaltered, by someone who’s a pure fan of what you do. Everyone who participates in online media is living what I call “the published life.” So it is our duty as artists to wake up to this not-so-new-anymore reality and use it to our advantage.

Rethinking Everything

Rather than delineate between delivery methods, perhaps we should force ourselves to think holistically about how information is shared. The money may no longer be found in having control of the owned information (i.e., a specific MP3 file), but instead be amassed through the exploitation and use of it (the posting of the MP3 to garner fans willing to pay for other things). How can we track individual usages for payments, when everything that’s ever been recorded can be flung around the world from phone to phone? Zeroes and ones–the plasma of digital life–present challenges to piracy prevention because they are indistinguishable from each other: the binary digits that comprise a sweet .jpg of your grandmother are the same digits that comprise a stream of unlawfully obtained music. Copyright protection groups and performing rights organizations are avidly addressing this by developing watermarking techniques and tracking systems, but as of this date these are regrettably imperfect technologies with notable gaps in the swath of their reach. With a billion or more internet users around the planet, has the scale exceeded the capacities of our old system of protecting intellectual property? Rather than try to expand the scope of the same historic methods—created eons before anyone could say “file sharing”—might we need to entirely reconsider the way media is used, and how best to now remunerate content owners whose ball is in play on a vastly different field? And while doing so, might we also need to examine what the currency of the exchange really is?

The web is where serendipity meets initiative, especially for copyright holders. Doing business in the digital age means being highly proactive about every opportunity because we now have the ability to be so, from the comfort of our desk in our pajamas. It is currently impossible to prevent the spread of digital files. Period. No matter what kind of copy protection can be applied, the next morning a brilliant 13-year-old will have devised a way around it. But we can aid and abet the spread of the buzz about our digital files. It stands to reason that the more popular a file is, the more fans its creator has gained— and that many of those fans will be inclined to participate in some financial way in the creator’s future output.

If we want to succeed in the open market, we need to proceed with an open mind. I enjoy the succinct advice of Seth Godin, who appears to have a clear view into many businesses, including ours. In his essay, “Music Lessons,” Seth observes, “You used to sell plastic and vinyl. Now, you can sell interactivity and souvenirs.” That’s right. It’s the experience of what we create that compels people, not just what we create.

When we play through a piece of music, we don’t focus on every 16th note in a measure, we express the sweep of the arcing phrase, and that can often be several measures long. The new paradigm of digital uses is not dissimilar. Unless the copyright infringement could result in a significant financial claim, rather than bolting off in a desperate chase after individual files, might it be wiser to adopt a broader perch perspective? We could consider what the digital-era worth of that file might be: an attractive phrase that draws in the listeners. The very thing we would like to be paid for is the very thing we give away in order to be paid for it. Becoming a successful music entrepreneur in this new era requires the same Escher-esque savvy that long has had restaurateurs giving away free hors d’oeuvres, liquor companies hosting free drink promotions at popular night spots, and perfume counters offering free dabs of their choicest scents from tester bottles. Can this become a viable strategy by which to exploit creative content? Or is this economy of exposure merely a mirage that devalues something we view as precious?

Just as Kutiman’s mash-ups are art and publicity rolled into one, so is what any of us create and publish. We know that we can’t buy groceries with publicity alone. But it is increasingly difficult to rely solely on the inherent worth of our art to generate income. We wouldn’t be artists unless what we created was intensely important to us. But to be an artist is to be a communicator, and the tools of the 21st century have forever altered the way in which we reach our audiences. I’m compelled to keep asking myself uncomfortable questions that challenge my previous assumptions. Whether or not artists—a.k.a. content providers and copyright holders—are ready for it, the revolution is upon us. In the economy of exposure, perhaps our strongest currency is not our creations, but rather, we, the creators.

***

name

Composer Alex Shapiro aligns note after note with the hope that a few of them might sound good next to each other. Through her website, her MySpace and Facebook pages, and her blog, she experiences the rewarding results from the advice she shares. In early 2007 she moved from Los Angeles to live amidst nature on remote San Juan Island off the coast of Washington State, and thanks to the internet, her musical life has never been busier. Alex currently serves on the board of directors of the American Music Center.

Rediscovering Henry Cowell

[Ed. Note: The following article has been excerpted from an essay by Leon Botstein written for the program book for An American Biography: The Music of Henry Cowell, the upcoming American Symphony Orchestra concert he will conduct at Lincoln Center’s Avery Fisher Hall on January 29, 2010. The issues Botstein raises go well beyond their pertinence to that particular event and even beyond the music of any individual composer and therefore seemed particularly appropriate to present on these pages. – FJO]

name
Henry Cowell
Photo courtesy G. Schirmer / Associated Music Publishers

There was no more distinctly American composer in the first half of the 20th century than Henry Cowell. Cowell was twenty years old when the United States entered the First World War. His career coincided with a time in history in which the America of his day was the China of today. The United States was growing rapidly and was at the cutting edge of industrial competitiveness. It had outstripped Europe and was on its way to becoming the largest economy in the world. During Cowell’s lifetime it would take its place as the most powerful nation on earth. For Europeans, Americans represented industriousness, competition, innovation; America was the future. While earlier generations of European intellectuals found ways to see the United States as backward and provincial, by the time World War I ended, America was no longer a plausible object of derision. Rather it became an object of fascination and emulation, and for that very reason, also a focus of anxiety. In the interwar period, the distinguished German critic and theorist Siegfried Krackauer pointed to the Radio City Rockettes to exemplify the dangers of spiritual mechanization of the human that powered America’s economic and political domination. Through music and film, America became a leading exporter of culture. Given the devastation that took place in Europe, European artists flocked to the United States for patronage and audiences.

It is therefore not surprising that while all this was going on, an optimistic spirit of innovation flourished in the arts in the United States. Insofar as music in American life before 1917 seemed to be derivative in its indebtedness to European models, the challenge facing young American artists in the 1920s was the creation of something distinctly and uniquely American. Now that America, though still young, seemed fully realized as a nation, it demanded that its own distinctive voice be heard. The character of that voice would have to match the industrial spirit of America. It had to be marked by a self-conscious modernity and a faith in innovation.

Cowell’s career coincides with the advent of American modernism in painting, sculpture, and architecture. He was an experimentalist and a pluralist. True to America’s identity as an immigrant nation, he embraced influences from numerous sources. He broke the boundaries that had been erected between types and genres of music. He invented new sounds. He introduced the work of composers from all over the world to American audiences. No individual was more responsible than Cowell for bringing America’s first truly original master of composition, Charles Ives, to the public’s attention. Ives reciprocated with support for Cowell and his activities. Cowell’s interests encompassed not only experimental and avant-garde modernism, but that which we today awkwardly call world music. And while his energy and productivity are themselves a source of amazement, so too is the list of those indebted to Cowell for his role as mentor and advocate.

This impressive record of achievement thus begs the question: why is it that more than three quarters of the devoted audience for classical and concert music today might not recognize even the name Henry Cowell, much less his music? A search of programs by American orchestras and ensembles will reveal that very little if any of Cowell’s music is played. Is the answer to the question that Cowell was simply a great organizer, teacher, and thinker whose music isn’t worth performing? That would be the most commonplace answer.

Its apparent plausibility rests in the mistaken but recalcitrant idea that first, the standard repertory today reflects the collective and legitimate aesthetic judgment of history and therefore a quasi-Darwinian process of objective selection, and second, that music is an art that demands competitive comparison, that only works befitting the attribute “masterpiece” deserve the time and effort to be heard and played in concert. By this standard, not a single work by Henry Cowell has survived. Indeed, from the perspective of the self-styled arbiters of taste who pronounce summary judgment based on criteria worthy of a beauty contest or quiz show, music such as his deserves to be met with skepticism before the performance, and afterwards dismissed with the comment that these works do not compare with the major works of Mozart, Beethoven, Mahler, Bartók, or Stravinsky.

But the judgment of history does not constitute an objective test. Consider the fate of Henry Cowell. The scandal surrounding his imprisonment for homosexuality, and the easy association in many circles between aesthetic radicalism and left-wing politics damaged his reputation and career during his lifetime and posthumously. For all of America’s celebration of its own love of invention and innovation, there has been a dark side to American cultural life: an enormous pressure to conform, the rule of a marketplace that is intolerant of genuine individuality and dissent, and a risk-averse anti-intellectualism derived from mistrust, isolationism, and commercial interest. Henry Cowell’s career and music have consistently tripped the wires of all of these negative attitudes. As a result, for the last fifty years, his music was deprived of the hearing it deserved except in a small community of devoted advocates. More exposure is necessary to permit a reasonable assessment of the worth of his many compositions. Only after repeated performances can we as performers and listeners decide which works we prefer and which seem more persuasive than others. Even within the output of the most famous composers there are hierarchies of taste. In Cowell’s case, exposure denied by the musical establishment at large for extraneous and specious reasons has prevented most listeners from exercising any sort of judgment.

For some odd reason, changing inherited impressions has become much harder in music than it has in either painting or literature. In music, the unremitting standard of the “masterpiece” is more of an excluding factor than it is in any other art. Why does listening to a piece of concert music require a judgment to determine it is not something else—perhaps by Stravinsky, Mozart, Mahler, or Copland? We do not read books this way, and we do not view paintings this way. We do not furnish our homes with paintings and prints and objects that way. No one could argue with the idea that Botticelli’s paintings or Shakespeare’s plays are daunting and overwhelming examples of the triumph of human imagination. But the greatest Botticelli or Shakespeare need not diminish our appreciation of other paintings and plays. We do not reject plays and paintings old or new in our theaters and museums because they are not Botticelli and Shakespeare. We do not demand that the only things performed or displayed are by Botticelli and Shakespeare. We profess a wider and more eclectic range of appreciation for unquestionably excellent examples of human expression in painting and writing. Yet in music, a dominant snobbery apparent in writers, performers, and listeners would shut down the exercise of curiosity. Young performers and conductors learn and offer almost exactly the same historical repertoire that their counterparts did thirty and fifty years ago. Concert promoters encourage this. But as Cowell understood, music is an experience of life in the world. There is a wide range of music that inspires, ennobles and delights audiences who have the insight to listen to a work in relation to their personal preferences or opinions, not in relation to what they have learned are the narrow group of the “best” composers and compositions.

Performing unfamiliar repertoire is not about searching for lost treasures. Our only standard is that it is music that deserves to be enjoyed and experienced. The music must have the inspiration and craftsmanship to capture the attention of those who love to play and listen. We should not be on some sort of Antiques Roadshow, trying to assess rare work by some pre-existing standard of comparative values. We should not be in the business of being musical truffle hounds. Performing Henry Cowell’s music shows not rarity but the unexpected vastness, quality, and depth of musical expression that is available to be heard within the history of music. Not every work will take its place alongside an acknowledged masterpiece, but it doesn’t have to.

As in other arts, all kinds of music contribute to an unimaginably large and varied experience, in which anyone will eventually find something they like. For those who restricted their capacity for the joy of music to a few famous works (an unreasonable fragment of cultural history), they may find that repetition of those works will ultimately eviscerate their power to move the listener by eroding the essential reactions of surprise and engagement those works inspire.

In the course of history, generations reverse themselves. The great work of the past can fade and be replaced by a reversal of judgment. In the end what appeals to the audience is determined by criteria the audience brings to their experience, shaped by the historical circumstances around them. That is what lies beneath the legendary observation of Leonard Bernstein regarding Gustav Mahler’s assertion that “my time will come”: it did. Mahler’s music did not change, but the way it was perceived and interpreted underwent a radical reevaluation. Henry Cowell may be due for such a reevaluation.

***

name
Leon Botstein conducting the American Symphony Orchestra
Photo by Richard Termine; courtesy 21C Media Group

Leon Botstein has had a multifaceted career as a conductor, musicologist, and administrator. Music director and principal conductor of the American Symphony Orchestra (ASO) since 1992 and the Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra and Israel Broadcasting Authority since 2003, he is also the Editor of The Musical Quarterly (since 1992) and has served as the President of New York’s Bard College since 1975 where he is additionally the Leon Levy Professor in the Arts and Humanities and the co-director of the Bard Music Festival. At the age of 23, Botstein became the youngest college president in the history of the country, heading Franconia College in New Hampshire from 1970 to 1975. He is the author of Jefferson’s Children: Education and the Promise of American Culture (Doubleday, 1997); Judentum und Modernität: Essays zur Rolle der Juden in der Deutschen und Österreichischen Kultur, 1848–1938 (Böhlau Verlag, 1991); The History of Listening: How Music Creates Meaning (forthcoming, Basic Books); and Music and Modernism (forthcoming, Yale University Press), and has additionally written articles on a variety of topics for the Christian Science Monitor, Chronicle of Higher Education, Gramophone, Harper’s, New Republic, New York Times, 19th-Century Music, Partisan Review, Psychoanalytic Psychology, Salmagundi, and the Times Literary Supplement, among others. Botstein’s extensive discography, both with ASO and other orchestras, includes premiere recordings of works by Max Bruch, Ernö Dohnányi, Johh Foulds, George Perle, Roger Sessions, Bruno Walter, and Richard Wilson, among others. Upcoming concert performances, in addition to the ASO’s all-Cowell program, include a program devoted to late 20th century Russian orchestral works, also with ASO, a program devoted to rarely heard works by Dvorak with the Jerusalem Symphony (March 2010), and appearances at the 2010 Bard Music Festival, Alban Berg and his World (August 13-22).

Nathaniel Stookey and Daniel Handler Raise the Dead

Sergei Prokofiev’s Peter and the Wolf is arguably the most iconic piece of music for young audiences in the classical repertoire. If you’re a professional orchestral musician, performing it is unavoidable. However, with the addition of Nathaniel Stookey’s composition for narrator and orchestra—ironically entitled The Composer Is Dead—the Prokofiev classic, as well as Britten’s The Young Person’s Guide to the Orchestra, now have some serious competition.

The San Francisco Symphony commissioned the new work, a collaboration with celebrated children’s book author Lemony Snicket (the pen name of Daniel Handler, who served as the work’s librettist and narrator), in 2006. And that first performance, like those of all too many new compositions, could have been the last.

name
Artwork from The Composer Is Dead
Illustration by Carson Ellis; courtesy of HarperCollins

But The Composer Is Dead has received over 50 performances since its July 8, 2006, world premiere in San Francisco. With more scheduled performances by additional orchestras, including the Winnipeg Symphony in October of 2009 and the National Symphony Orchestra in May of 2010, the work shows no signs of retreating into the shadows. “We definitely have heard from orchestras how tired they were of playing Peter and the Wolf,” says Handler. “So I think to some extent, it’s relieving a certain tedium from programmers of young people’s concerts and the orchestras who perform them.”

The Composer Is Dead is, at its heart, a musical murder mystery, in which an inquisitive inspector seeks to solve the case of a recently deceased composer by interrogating the various instruments in the orchestra. “The thing I love about this piece,” says Edwin Outwater, who conducted the 2006 premiere and the 2009 SFS recording that followed, “is that it’s pretty sophisticated, and somehow manages to be accessible and communicate with kids without being easy or facile in any way. Even the little kids who don’t get the music jokes get the feeling that there’s something subversive and naughty going on with this piece, and they’re into it.” The work’s accessibility may be due in part to its lack of a sterile, academic attitude toward its audience. “It doesn’t feel like penicillin to me,” Handler stresses. “It doesn’t feel like something we ought to give to children so that they turn out better.”

Katy Tucker, promotion manager for G. Schirmer—the company that publishes Stookey’s work—also recognizes the subtle educational approach of The Composer Is Dead. “It is not only an engaging piece of music that is educational in and of itself, but it’s also an engaging story for kids, so they’re learning something without actually knowing that they’re learning something, which is very similar to Peter and the Wolf.”

But unlike Peter and the Wolf, The Composer Is Dead draws much of its educational value from narration that chips away at any seeming austerity or musical snobbery by exposing common stereotypes about the instruments—whether it be the aviary tendencies of the flutes or the often-overlooked, underappreciated contributions of the violas. But instead of apologizing for these characteristics, Handler seems to revel in them, and invites the listener to share in all the affectionate jesting. Stookey’s score both enhances the humor and offers insight into the instruments’ typical function within the orchestra—from the boisterous brass section, whose incessant fanfare borders between enjoyable effervescence and obnoxious grandstanding, to the timid yet lovely arpeggios of the harp, identified here as the tuba’s “Landlady.”

Interestingly enough, perhaps the greatest compositional achievement of the work was not written by Stookey, per se. The “Funeral March,” which the composer refers to as “a complete mind sudoku in music,” serves as the climax of the piece. The march quotes 12 works of famous composers—ranging from Bach’s St. Matthew’s Passion and the requiems of Mozart and Brahms to Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring and Schoenberg’s Pierrot lunaire—all in the original keys and orchestrations.

The most distinctive element of the piece, according to the composer, is the opening “hook” or death theme. San Francisco Symphony trombonist Paul Welcomer would probably concur. “He [Handler] says the first line— ‘The composer is dead.’ —and then you hit those big octaves, and see all the kids in the audience, just see their eyes sort of get big,” remembers Welcomer. “And then they’ll probably get it, that it’s a motive. When that comes back, they remember it.” But trombones are not the only lower brass instruments to get the spotlight. The composition also contains what Welcomer calls “the loveliest tuba solo ever written—period.”

According to Stookey, pleasing the audience means pleasing the musicians first. “I was thinking more of the players—Are they going to be able to take this kids’ piece and really sink their teeth into it instead of the typical kids’ pieces?” says Stookey. San Francisco Symphony bassist Charles Chandler was indeed pleased with The Composer Is Dead. “It’s great to have a storyline like that, and humor and good music, and combine it all in one package, but I think it’s hard to do. And they did it really, really well.” Welcomer recalls having an “Oh—finally!” moment of realization that The Composer Is Dead represented what children’s music should be.

And while the work’s creators acknowledge how Peter and the Wolf succeeds, they are also aware of its limitations. “Peter and the Wolf is a beautiful piece of music, but pedagogically, it doesn’t really introduce you to the orchestra,” explains librettist Handler. “If you didn’t know what a flute sounded like, you still won’t know. And so that was our goal—to have it that you could honestly walk in and not know what any of the instruments were, and you could come out knowing what they were.”

name
Librettist and narrator Daniel Handler during the recording of The Composer Is Dead. Photo courtesy of the San Francisco Symphony

Rather than refer directly to the musicians, the instruments themselves are personified in Handler’s text. “When you hear the trombone section suddenly come in, you hear the personality of the trombones,” says Handler, “and you’re probably not thinking of the unionized guys and gals who’ve been rehearsing for weeks in order to bring you this performance. I think that seems natural.” Conductor Outwater also recognizes the importance of the orchestra’s distinct traits in The Composer Is Dead. “I think thematically, both in the text and the music, the underlying message, which isn’t explicitly stated, is that the orchestra is an organism quite full of personality and variety,” he says.

When Outwater led his Kitchener-Waterloo Symphony in a performance of the piece in March of 2008, it was part of an evening program designed for both kids and adults. Even with all of the trappings of children’s music, The Composer Is Dead is very much a composition written for adults.

“I wanted to write a piece for skeptics, and I would say, if anything, I was addressing my own generation even more than my children’s generation,” says composer Stookey. “All the people I know, that is most of them, don’t really find classical music that engaging or exciting, partly because they don’t know it and they haven’t been exposed to it. They see it as being remote, rule-bound, and often they see it as lacking emotional immediacy, which to those of us who love classical music, [we] can’t understand at all. But we wanted to reach those people with something that would be immediately engaging without being trite. You know, we wanted to seduce them, or as Daniel [Handler] says, ‘We wanted to trick them into listening.'”

name
Composer Nathaniel Stookey during The Composer Is Dead recording sessions. Photo courtesy of the San Francisco Symphony

In some ways, The Composer Is Dead is not merely an orchestral concert piece, either. Stookey sees the narrative-heavy drama of the work as something akin to opera, which makes complete sense in light of Stookey and Handler’s aspirations to write an opera together.

In the more immediate future, however, there are plans to take The Composer Is Dead on tour as a puppet show. Handler envisioned the opportunity to spread the composition beyond the concert hall after witnessing firsthand the enthusiasm that suburban and small town audiences had for his Lemony Snicket books. In collaboration with New York-based puppeteers Phantom Limb, Handler plans to circumvent the limitations of touring with an orchestra by using the SFS recording in conjunction with the puppets.

But what does the now-proven success of The Composer Is Dead in live performance say about current audiences and the culture of classical music? For Outwater, the piece represents a sea change, liberation from what he sees as the “needless formality of concert music.” “I think the more we can break down those barriers of us taking ourselves so seriously, rather than just being ourselves and taking the music seriously, the better we’ll be,” he asserts. “And this piece kind of automatically does that, it kind of intentionally shoots down all those kind of snobby constructs that have built up around classical music.”

But once such a work is accepted into the repertoire, a difficult question remains: Where does it fit? Stookey admits there’s no easy answer. “It’s an unfortunate thing about orchestras generally, that there tend to be these pretty strong divisions between what is pops, and what is classical, and what is education, and things that cross lines—it’s a little hard to know where they go.”

name
Daniel Handler performing The Composer Is Dead with the San Francisco Symphony; Edwin Outwater, conductor. Photo courtesy of the San Francisco Symphony

Outwater feels that the difficulty lies in the perceived need to be everything for everybody. “It’s always a challenge to write a new work that keeps its integrity for so many different people who have so many different agendas for it—the educators: ‘Does this educate?’; the orchestra players: ‘Does this feel right to me playing this piece?’; to the orchestra administrators: ‘Is this classy enough for us to do?’. There’s a lot of people who have agendas for new music, and the really successful pieces kind of transcend all of them somehow.”

The work’s adult-friendly, populist appeal hasn’t kept it from being pigeonholed as a children’s piece, however. Subsequently, Stookey has seen the potential pitfalls of being typecast as a children’s composer firsthand, having turned down two educational commissions for works since the premiere of The Composer Is Dead. “I think it is a danger, if you only do one thing, being known only for that one thing, and eventually only being able to do that one thing,” says Stookey. “Britten and Prokofiev weren’t [typecast] because of what else they produced. And we only know their works for children because of their huge reputations as composers of all manner of things.”

Stookey also takes issue with the segregation of composers into different philosophical camps: “I think one of the great tragedies of the times that I grew up in, in terms of the restrictions that composers felt—you had to belong to one ‘ism’ or another ‘ism.’ I have teachers who taught themselves into one of these ‘isms’—whichever one it was, it made no difference. And it never resonated for them, and you can hear that in their music.”

*

But while The Composer Is Dead is grounded in the world of classical music, its roots go deep in the artistic community of San Francisco, where Stookey and Handler both reside. Both men attend “Sausages,” a loose gathering of local writers and musicians who meet over beer and sausages. “The literary scene kind of feels like family—very appealing,” says Stookey, whose early compositional output did not utilize text. “For me it’s been part of coming home, ’cause I grew up here. I’ve been rediscovering that link between music and language.”

The “Sausages” meetings have also given rise to a Stookey composition-in-process called Seven by Seven—a seven-song work about San Francisco (which is seven by seven miles in area) —with words by Handler and his “Sausages” cohorts Andrew Sean Greer, Robert Mailer Anderson, and others.

The interaction between music and literature has also impacted Handler’s approach to his craft. “I definitely feel structural, pacing ideas from music and bring it over to literature,” says Handler, a former San Francisco Boys’ Choir member. He has also performed in two of Stephin Merritt’s bands—The Magnetic Fields and The Gothic Archies—as an accordionist. “I think the advantage of having a musical background is that if you then go into another art form, you can look at things that those other writers aren’t looking at—structural ideas.” In researching a play he is currently writing for a small cast of actors, Handler has referred to Stravinsky’s Octet for Wind Instruments for inspiration regarding structure and utilization of characters: “I’ve just been thinking about, ‘Well, when you have a relatively small number of instruments, what kind of structure is being used?'”

*

On the subject of Stookey’s music, Handler is candid and to the point: “I think it’s notable that he is one of the few working composers, at least that I’m aware of, that has not produced a work that is either incredibly grating or incredibly boring.”

“The fact that I write string quartets or ‘serious music’ doesn’t mean that I don’t occasionally have the urge to write a heavy metal ballad,” explains Stookey, whose other compositions range from the more conventional—an in progress collection of songs with words by opera singer Frederica von Stade—to the experimental—Junkestra. “It’s basically a garbage orchestra, but it’s a serious kind of pitched piece of music for found objects,” says the composer.

name
Composer Nathaniel Stookey
Photo courtesy of G. Schirmer

Stookey’s compositional priorities do not come from his audiences, whether they’re 8 or 80. “As I’m composing, I just have this buzz, and I just want to pass that on in as direct a way as I can. I feel like if you are successful as an artist, all that means is that what you do satisfies you yourself; also by chance—really, by chance, reaches other people.”

Antonia Joy Wilson, artistic director and conductor of the Midland Symphony Orchestra in Michigan saw enthusiasm for The Composer Is Dead in a tangible way when the work helped to draw 300 new audience members to a special Halloween concert in October 2008. “I could see the potential of how an exciting format like The Composer is Dead could open up more doors by creating dramatic musical stories for our living composers and writers to run and fly with creatively,” says Wilson.

Bassist Charles Chandler seesThe Composer Is Dead as aspirational for children’s music repertoire. “I’m hoping that it would be inspiring to people to see, ‘Wow, this is what’s possible. This is the level that we should be fighting for with these programs.'”

***

name
Daniel J. Kushner
Photo by Stephen Pelaia

Daniel J. Kushner is a 2009 graduate of the Goldring Arts Journalism Program at Syracuse University’s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications. Kushner has served as a classical music critic for The Post-Standard of Syracuse, New York, and interned with NewMusicBox from June to August 2009. He currently resides in Brooklyn.

Fitzcarraldo Goes to Bali

1

name
Marc Molomot as Colin McPhee and Gamelan Salukat as enraged villagers in Evan Ziporyn’s opera A House in Bali, Puri Saraswati, Ubud, Bali, June 26 2009; photo by Christine Southworth


NewMusicBox is pleased to be able to offer this 40-minute excerpt from the premiere performance of A House in Bali.

“Opera in the jungle”—this was the goal of the protagonist of Werner Herzog’s 1982 film Fitzcarraldo who maniacally tried to pull a steamship over a mountain in Peru. He wanted to build an opera house, to bring the “expression of our deepest feelings,” or at least western civilization’s best effort at it, to the Amazon. This summer I did something much simpler, much less ambitious, and even less necessary than Herzog’s “conquest of the useless.” But Fitzcarraldo kept coming to mind. I had written an opera, and I wanted to premiere it in Bali—not exactly the jungle, but close. We performed on the steps of a temple to Saraswati, the goddess of art and culture, under the stars, in the center of Ubud, very near the spot where the events the opera depicts—Colin McPhee’s memoir A House in Bali—had taken place.

Why bring an opera to Bali? Good authority has it that no Western opera had been staged there before. This may well be the case, and given the forces involved in A House in Bali—the Bang on a Can All-Stars, a 16-piece Balinese gamelan, three opera singers, and four traditional Balinese singer/dancers—one could argue that this record is still intact: it’s some distance from La Traviata. But in Bali, unlike Fitzcarraldo’s Peru, it’s hard to see this as a problem. Bali has long had its own “opera,” in the form of arja, a parallel tradition to our own, and in its 19th-century glory very much a gesamtkunstwerk. Furthermore, the Balinese—along with myriad other Indonesian cultures—have been incorporating outside influences, instruments, and ideas into their music for centuries.

So the question really is: why perform this opera in Bali, particularly once the economy went south and our funding shriveled? The subject itself demanded it: Colin McPhee left Bali in 1938 in part because, as he said, “I will always remain the outsider.” He never came back, though in his absence he became woven into the fabric of Balinese culture, deeply influencing not just Westerners like myself, but also many Balinese scholars and musicians, in a variety of ways. In Bali, heroes and ancestors are enshrined in house temples, inscribed into paintings, and invigorated anew through performance. I felt McPhee deserved the same treatment. I think of myself as one of McPhee’s spiritual descendants—part of an ongoing line of Westerners who follow in his footsteps, a composer coming to Bali to study gamelan, and then spending the rest of my life figuring out what it has to do with my own music. So from the beginning this felt like dharma, a duty I needed to at least try to fulfill.

On top of that somewhat romantic conceit, there were pragmatic reasons: we needed to rehearse for the upcoming U.S. premiere, and it made more sense to bring ten Western musicians to Bali than to bring twenty Balinese musicians to America. And it seemed like it’d be fun—putting three opera singers and the Bang on a Can All-Stars in a room with a full Balinese gamelan and four Balinese actor/singers—and then on an open-air stage in the tropical night. What could possibly go wrong?

*

In the United States, Colin McPhee is frankly marginal. His music is lovingly revived on occasion, but to be honest, after Bali, he never got his career—or his life—back on track. He couldn’t seem to fully recover from his seven years in paradise. Most conductors were not interested in the overt exotica of Tabuh tabuhan, his 1936 “toccata on Balinese themes.” For the most part, they still aren’t. And possibly McPhee wasn’t either. He spoke frankly of losing his desire to write music while in Bali, and even his most beautiful post-Bali piece, the 1947 Suite in Six Movements, was “composed” somewhat passively, centering on a two-piano arrangement of Balinese transcriptions he had made during the 1930s. These are fleshed out by three other transcriptions, all delicately orchestrated in a proto-minimalist manner. But were these compositions or arrangements, and when would McPhee give up this Bali nonsense and get back to business? It’s a question he himself clearly struggled with, as evidenced by withdrawn pieces, long periods of writer’s block, and a smattering of enigmatic attempts to square the circle, to reconcile Balinese modality with modernist angularity. Various plans to return to Bali fell through, and he barely completed his magnum opus, the encyclopedic Music in Bali, only months before his death in 1964.

In Bali, though, McPhee looms large. He was the trailblazer, the first Westerner for whom distant admiration of gamelan was not enough: on the basis of a few scratchy 78s (remastered and released by World Arbiter on the CD, The Roots of Gamelan), he abandoned Paris and a promising compositional career, hopping the next steamer for Singaraja. (He was accompanied by his wife, anthropologist Jane Belo, though she is unmentioned in his book.) He wanted to document the music, which he considered doomed. “A thousand forces are at work to destroy it,” he wrote. As for the Balinese, they were “caught in a net, which is now being slowly dragged in.” Was he prescient or just pessimistic? Balinese gamelan thrives, not just in Bali but worldwide, and the distinctiveness of Balinese culture itself is a major draw for thousands of tourists annually. This may well have been exactly what McPhee feared. The Bali he knew is largely gone, or at least a lot harder to find, overrun not just by surfers and scholars but by modernity itself. While working on the opera we made the mandatory pilgrimage to the site of his house, in the village of Sayan, a few kilometers west of Ubud. When he built the house in the 1930s, the villagers had profoundly mixed feelings about having a Westerner in their midst: as soon as the house was complete, they barricaded him inside it. Now it’s a trendy emigré neighborhood, and on McPhee’s land sits a luxury hotel. After closing night, we coincidentally held the after party right next door: the view was to die for. That being said, though, this ‘famous’ view of the Ayung River—where McPhee first spotted Sampih (the boy he later adopted and schooled) bathing, and which was subsequently coveted by the Japanese ‘tourist’ Sagami at the climax of McPhee’s memoir—now overlooks guided rafting tours and the Four Seasons Resort, along the banks of the same river.

Even by his own account, McPhee’s reasons for leaving Bali in 1938 were ambiguous, a combination of factors that left him in a state of unease. War was in the air, and Sagami’s “friendly” visit creeped him out. Lèyak (ricefield ghosts) had been spotted in the vicinity. The music was changing in ways McPhee wasn’t sure he understood or approved: “[M]ore and more the new kebyars seemed to resemble each other, seemed intended only to dazzle and bewilder.” And his protégé Sampih was getting moody and unruly, “aware of his charm” and “in need of discipline.” Not mentioned in McPhee’s own writing was the Dutch colonial authority’s crackdown on “immoral behavior”—homosexuality, to be exact. Scores of white men were being rounded up, including his good friend, German painter Walter Spies, who was arrested only days after McPhee’s departure. The idyll was over; it was time to go home.

He never came back. But many of the musicians and dancers he encouraged and supported—Sampih, composer Wayan Lotring, Madé Lebah, and Anak Agung Mandera, among others—played key parts in the artistic revival of the ’50s and ’60s, forming the core of the famous Dancers of Bali who took Broadway by storm in 1952. The tour captured America’s imagination, and can be argued to have begun the modern gamelan movement in the United States. He did reunite with that group in New York, screening his 1930s film footage for them at the Museum of Natural History, but this reconnection also meant suffering through news of Sampih’s brutal murder, back in Sayan Village later that year. McPhee himself died 10 years later, never living to see the fruition of so many of the seeds he planted in Bali: the set of instruments he himself designed being featured on Nonesuch’s Gamelan of the Love God in 1972, his encyclopedia becoming a required text at the National Arts Academy in Denpasar, and this itself being emblematic of a new Balinese conscientious toward classical, archaic forms, many of which were near lost before McPhee set out to find and document them. Finally, the memoir itself, A House in Bali, is to this day prominently displayed in tourist bookshops all over the island. You can even buy it in the airport, though it’s hard to know how McPhee would feel about that.

Western composers with a commitment to Balinese music all live in McPhee’s shadow, and we all know it. He is our totem, our object lesson. In my own case, it was 1979, exactly 50 years later, and LPs rather than 78s, but the effect was the same: I started planning my trip from the first stroke of the gong on Music from the Morning of the World. When I arrived, my first kendang teacher was Madé Lebah himself, McPhee’s driver and musical scout, who told loving tales of his adventures with McPhee, searching for the ancient angklung and up-to-the-minute kebyar. But he also pointed out that he never once saw McPhee touch a gamelan instrument, and that things stopped being fun whenever McPhee started to drink. “Waktu dia minum, langsung saya pulang.” ( “When he drank, I’d go home.”)

But wait—did McPhee really never touch a gamelan? That can’t literally be true. But there’s something important about the idea: McPhee had no roadmap, no guidance for his methodology, and no exit strategy. There were no American gamelans for him to return to in 1938, no ethnomusicology departments for him to join. (When Mantle Hood began both at UCLA in the late 1950s, he immediately hired McPhee.) With the notable exception of Carlos Chávez, who commissioned Tabuh tabuhan, most of his cohort seemed to be waiting for him to get over it and return to planet Earth. McPhee internalized this conflict and never seems to have resolved it—it’s played out overtly in enigmatic late pieces like Transitions and the Third Symphony—but he seems to have spent a lot of time not writing music. Even those of us in his debt don’t want to end up living his life. He’s both a role model and a warning sign, a path to follow, but only up to a point.

Still, I’ve walked that path, even when it seemed a tightrope, following a musical course that is not necessarily bi-polar but certainly bi-hemispheric, if you will. Oscillating between the pull of two small islands, Manhattan and Bali, between Bang on a Can and Gamelan Galak Tika, I’ve long realized that I had no easy way to describe what connects the disparate musical worlds I inhabit, or to even be certain that there is a connection to describe. Like McPhee, I found more than I bargained for in Bali; also like him, I didn’t immediately know what to do about it when I returned. But because of him, I knew what not to do.

For years there was a part of me that hoped that every gamelan piece I wrote would be my last, that I’d be able to sum things up and move on. At a certain point, as my involvement with Balinese culture rounded the quarter-century mark, I began to revisit that sentiment. I continued to find depth and meaning in the sound and sensibility of Balinese music, not to mention in the musical juxtapositions themselves, what McPhee described in a different context as “jangled dissonance, merging to form constantly surprising harmonies.” For me, these map all too well to the various kinds of concords and discords—cultural, political, personal—that are implicit in the cross-cultural encounter. So I looked for a larger, all-encompassing project that would allow me to grapple with all these issues, musical and emotional, cultural and personal, on a broad palette. So when the idea of an opera about McPhee was presented to me—my mother actually dreamed it and called me on the phone, but that’s another story—I knew I had to do it, and I knew it had to be performed in Bali, before it was performed anywhere else.

 

2

The European settlers in Fitzcarraldo consider the indigenous people barbarous, people who “don’t wash their clothes…and can’t seem to be cured of the idea that our everyday life is only an illusion, behind which lies the reality of dreams.” But Fitzcarraldo understands— “I find these ideas most interesting; I myself specialize in opera.” This marks him as an eccentric, a madman. How could any cultured European find anything to admire in indigenous life? Of course, for westerners in Bali, the situation is entirely reversed. We stand in awe of Balinese culture, its refinement, its history, its pervasive presence in everyday life, and we’re baffled when friends back home don’t get it or even appreciate it with sufficient ardor. Even in America, for anyone who pays attention, it’s difficult to remain oblivious to the virtuosity and elegance of Balinese performance. More difficult to grasp is what it provides for the Balinese: a constant reification of purpose and space, a sense of what happened here which, once understood, is extremely difficult to forget.

Many forms of Balinese theater—including the classical wayang wong (‘human puppets’) and masked topeng— concern babad, stories of Balinese historical figures, heroic kings and prime ministers. These stories are presented to a people who not only believe in reincarnation but know who they were in their past lives. So these dramas aren’t about ancient Danes and Greeks, they’re about your friends and neighbors—they’re about you. A topeng dancer doesn’t play a role; when he dons the mask he becomes the character. By comparison, method acting is like playing dress up in the attic, or possibly an attempt to recapture this essential aspect of the dramatic impulse. Etched into this embodiment—on an almost molecular level—is the synergistic movement of dance and music, so entwined in energy and purpose that, until modern times, the Balinese didn’t bother distinguishing between them. As McPhee himself wrote for a New York Times preview of the Dancers of Bali tour of 1952, “In Bali dance and music are interwoven in daily life like gold threads in a fabric.”

The word bali means “offering”—which is to say that for the Balinese, life itself is devotional, with art simply one of the means. Performance—in the right context—cleanses and sanctifies, a notion that seems vestigial in all of us, any time we invest ourselves in a live performance. Sanctifying the moment, reanimating a historical character who has been whittled to his essence through similar performances over decades, centuries: this to me connects to Wagner, and before that to Sophocles. This is not manifest in any particular performance quality—in affect, rhetoric, implied ethic, whatever. There’s not necessarily any correlative there, no essential overlap in the ways these very different cultures do things.

The emotions and ideas that are expressed in Balinese theater are specific to Balinese culture in general, to the specific character being portrayed, and to the individuals doing the portrayal. But there’s a wholeness and an honesty to the presentation: we are seeing a representation of the complete package, who this person is or what this situation is to the performer. In writing A House in Bali, I imposed the same standard on myself, at least made my best effort at it, using my own artistic language to present the full picture of McPhee as I understand or interpret him. In this opera his virtues and his flaws needed to be drawn in high relief.

name
Desak Madé Suarti Laksmi and Kadek Dewi Aryani in Evan Ziporyn’s A House in Bali; photo by Christine Southworth

I initially went to Bali only for the music, having had my own conversion experience in 1979 with a recording, Music from the Morning of the World, while restocking LPs in Festoon’s Records in New Haven. I was at the time only dimly aware of—or interested in—other aspects of Balinese culture other than gamelan. What drew me had nothing to do with cultural context and everything to do with the abrupt, syncopated accents, precise and seemingly nonchalant, that by comparison made Le Sacre seem utterly passé. I spent the following summer as an ex-post-hippie in Oakland, playing with the newly-formed Gamelan Sekar Jaya, and while I furiously devoured interlocking rhythmic patterns, I silently realized that I was bored stiff by the endless dance dramas and masked dances these patterns were accompanying in performance. The dance itself I could admire for all the obvious reasons, but the drama made no sense to me whatsoever. And this didn’t really bother me.

But days after my first arrival in Bali, in 1981, I was taken to a new dance drama based on the puputan, the ceremonial mass suicide of the royal families that ushered in the colonial era in the early 20th century. To tell you the truth, I don’t remember much about the event beyond that—not the location, the occasion, the title, etc. Nor do I remember the composer, the performers, or the choreographer. I do remember it as my first experience of real Balinese ramé, the noisy business that’s the mark of a successful event: the standard Bali crowd scene, goat saté and coffee stands, plastic tschatkes for the kids, the smell of kretek cigarettes, etc. The crowd didn’t seem to be paying too much attention to the performance; they tuned it in and out as they liked— “hearing but not hearing,” as McPhee put it—but the performers didn’t seem to mind. Because Balinese performance is devotional—in the temple, for an unseen, divine audience—the rapt attention of mere mortals isn’t that high a priority in almost any circumstance. This in itself was liberating to me, coming from the western concert world and the inner demands a respectable classical nerd places on oneself. Unforgivable not to follow the progression of a piece with rapt attention from beginning to end! Even a moment of spacing out proves one’s unworthiness. It was a relief to be rid of that burden, even more when watching an extended dance drama in a language I didn’t understand. Here one could flow with the event; it made no demands on the psyche in that way: we were all present, with the music, and attention would be paid when attention was captured. So there was no need to be bored or frustrated as I might have been had I been sitting in a chair, watching an incomprehensible performance, and most likely simply meditating on jetlag, mosquito bites, and other ontological topics.

When my attention was captured, the extended moment redefined all my ideas about music and theater. This was the climactic moment itself, when the members of the Badung court approached their adversaries, the Dutch army. The music had reduced itself to a single note ostinato, on-off-on-off, over a short gong cycle and intense, highly syncopated drumming. The dynamics tracked directly to the emotional pitch of the confrontation itself: soft until the dancers went into a frenzy, then surging quickly to fortissimo as each individual dancer turned his or her magical kris knife on him or herself. Nothing would change except the volume, which would just as quickly return to pianissimo. Let’s be clear: this music was not “interesting” in any way I would have ordinarily used the term up until that point. It’s not the passage one would choose to talk about in a graduate seminar. A transcription would have shown 4/4, no melody or harmonic movement, nothing irregular. Why would one travel across the world to study that? (In fact, one of my revered composition teachers at the time, now sadly deceased, had before I left asked me, “It’s not all in 4/4, is it?”) But it worked, in a way that made the calculated connotations of that verb seem trivial. It cut through everything, went straight to the heart of the matter, the primality of the gesture itself. I was overcome by this sheer directness, this lack of ornament within this highly ornamented musical rhetoric—no tragic tune, no Adagio for Strings, a continuum between sound and story (they were one and the same), between history and the present moment. As I later learned (cf. Clifford Geertz, Negara: The Theater State of Nineteenth Century Bali), it was likely that the actual participants in the historical event, having elevated themselves into a trance state, would have been in similar dress, moving in a similar manner, to the sounds of gongs and drums. So what was happening, while highly stylized, was very much a reenactment, almost an embodiment.

I saw this, I admired it, I got it. It stayed with me as something to strive for in my own work. And yet, like McPhee, I was still a bystander, feeling it, but also watching the Balinese feeling it more. Or at least believing that was the case because, really, how would I know what “the Balinese” felt? But even the awareness of that likelihood was a kind of buffer. Westerners always experience Balinese performance at one remove—in Bali, on site, we are the outsiders; but even in America, every few years, when one group or another tours, these performers are the exoticized other, cordoned off and framed. We can observe but we can’t truly participate, even when we’re in the center of the action. Don’t get me wrong, there are frames aplenty in Balinese performance—strictures about appropriate context, what can and cannot be done where, when and for whom—but it’s different somehow; the frames are so ingrained that an individual has freedom of movement. The screen of the wayang delineates front and back, but the viewer can watch from either side of it. More to the point is that direct spiritual link. I believe McPhee craved it, for his own music and for his own life. He witnessed it, and for a time got inside it, built a house in the thick of it. For whatever reason, he couldn’t completely give in to it. It seems he never recovered from having to give it up, or not being able to make others understand. Or maybe I’m projecting this onto him because I crave it, too. In either case, that story—his story, which in this way, at least, is also my story—was the one I wanted to tell in this babad, this living history. I wanted to tell the story of my own artistic ancestor, presenting my understanding of him as fully as I could: his accomplishments, his failures, his strengths, and his very human weaknesses.

 

3

McPhee’s presence in Sayan caused a near-riot: at one point the villagers barricaded him in his house, essentially for building violations: making his driveway a little too wide, digging up shrubbery that didn’t belong to him. Like most people in the world, the Balinese have in general preferred outside influences to enter by osmosis and accrual, rather than by abrupt imposition. Until the 20th century, Bali was relatively isolated from outside influence, but we know that its music changed as instruments and ideas seeped over from Java and China. (Don’t make too much of this, but as more of the 1928 recordings are unearthed, it is reasonably argued that early kebyar was influenced—at least slightly—by the look and sound of Dutch military bands.) Once McPhee was accepted in Sayan, his neighbors were more than happy to accept his patronage and artistic advice, and this marks a moment in which there begins to be nascent cultural exchange, albeit in an advisory, behind-the-scenes context. The two signal international Balinese performance events of the 20th century, the kecak dance and the 1952 Dancers of Bali tour, also had their Svengalis. Each was the brainchild of a Western émigré, Walter Spies and John Coast respectively, both of whom can rightfully be considered co-creators.

Still, until the 1980s, the performers of Balinese music and dance—and this will probably seem tautological—were Balinese musicians and dancers. There were a handful of Balinese gamelans in America, but we kept mostly to ourselves until 1985, when Michael Tenzer led the Bay Area’s Sekar Jaya to the Bali Arts Festival. That performance, televised island-wide, created a genuine stir in Bali, just by the fact that we were playing gamelan at all; this genuinely shocked many people. Not just bagaimana (‘how?’) but kenapa (why?!?!). Why would these Westerners, who could have chosen to do anything, choose to do this? That moment, too, has passed. By now, most Balinese have figured it out: we find their culture pretty special. So today, in Bali 2009, the cross-cultural as such barely raises an eyebrow. While we were there this summer, the Arts Festival presented director Lynn Kremer’s Mimpi, with dancers and actors from Bali and America, and music for gamelan and cello by Desak Madé Suarti Laksmi; just down the road, at the Purnati Institute in the village of Mas, the Kronos Quartet workshopped a new work for strings and Javanese instruments by Ruhayu Supanggah.

name
Desak Made Suarti Laksmi and Nyoman Catra rehearsing with the Bang on a Can All-Stars above the Ubud Market; photo by Christine Southworth

Still, putting two tenors and a lyric soprano in front of a bunch of teenaged gamelan boys, and doing so within earshot of the Ubud market on a daily basis, felt like virgin territory. Our intrepid lead singer, Marc Molomot, more or less literally stepped off the plane from New York and into rehearsal with Gamelan Salukat, the group of young men that Dewa Ketut Alit had assembled to learn the music. Thankfully, Marc understood immediately that the ongoing laughter and imitations (15 Balinese boys singing “Figaro” during every break in the rehearsal) was a form of fascinated flattery. I’ve been prone to such behavior myself, and in fact, before this piece I’ve never been particularly comfortable writing for the operatic voice. I should confess here that I’m not really an opera lover, though I’ve had my share of epiphanies in the opera house. Before this piece, like a sizable contingent of my cohort (and you know who you are…), I had found the trained Western voice to be alienating, artificial, something that is ultimately not part of me or my music. This is not to say I didn’t have admiration for particular singers or hadn’t been moved by particular performances—when Fitzcarraldo puts Caruso on the Victrola, I feel it, believe me. But it didn’t seem part of my own musical vocabulary. On the other hand, the Western voice that does speak to me—the voice of pop music—also doesn’t sit very easily on the written score. Those of us in this position are, I think, continually looking for neutral territory—early music singers, for example—or for that holy grail, the pop singer who reads, a cross between Caruso and Cobain. Or, as in my case, up until a few years ago, we just avoid the subject, and don’t write much for voice. But for this project, in this context, for reasons I didn’t at first understand, I found myself strangely comfortable with the artifice of the lyric tenor, far more than I had in other pieces, where I had tried to place the trained Western voice in its indigenous environment, i.e., accompanied by Western instruments.

The Western singers were only half the story: the Balinese characters in the opera sang in their traditional style, an equally rarefied, specialized, and expressive practice, but in a completely different way—as far from Fischer-Dieskau and Beverly Sills as are Tom Waits and Bessie Smith. Vocal music is central in Balinese musical culture, as it is in the West, though you wouldn’t know this from reading McPhee, who turned a blind eye to it: singing goes almost completely unmentioned in all of Music in Bali. In conceiving the opera, I felt immediately that the juxtaposing these two vocal styles was at the heart of the matter. This felt necessary on every level—culturally, dramatically, and formally. And it was this juxtaposition that cut through my own complex relationship with operatic vocal style. Putting it together with an equally florid style that was utterly different, removed the burden of believing either to be somehow “natural” or inherently expressive, instead making their very artifice—their respective culture-specificness—the source of their beauty and power. It would make them—in the best possible sense— strange, as strange to the audience as McPhee must have seemed to the villagers of Sayan, and vice versa. The idea being that in hearing a lyric tenor with a gamelan, or a Balinese kekawin with an electric guitar, the orchid-like flamboyance of both might just be revealed.

Many of the real Fitzcarraldo aspects of the operation all had to do with production, but I’d rather not dwell on any of that now. In short, the economy hit us as it hit everyone else, leaving my original collaborators, who had midwifed the piece tirelessly and nobly, and who at times probably believed in it more than I did, sidelined and out of the picture. This all went down in late April, less than two months before the scheduled trip to Bali, which as mentioned was necessary if for no other reason than to prepare for the U.S. premiere in Berkeley this September. No Bali, no Berkeley. So I called in every marker I’ve garnered over my professional life—you don’t need to know the details, but suffice it to say every member of the production was approached on bended knee. And they all agreed to come along for the ride, in every case at some personal sacrifice. Two angels swooped down from heaven to close the funding gap, and Christine Southworth (of Ensemble Robot) and Kenny Savelson (of Bang on a Can) took over the production reins. Suddenly, the trip was back on, and we figured that if we were going to go to Bali to rehearse, we might as well go forward with the performance, in front of Saraswati’s temple, even without such niceties as sets, lighting, or a production crew.

Every day in Bali brought new surprises, the good outweighing the bad just enough for us to keep going. Anne Harley, the soprano cast as Margaret Mead, agreed to stage the piece and serve as general ringmaster, and she somehow found a way to reconcile a tight production schedule with the Balinese concept of jam karet (rubber time). Rehearsals could apparently only be planned on a day to day basis, and even then in the broadest possible increments, “late afternoon” as opposed to a specific time. A temple ceremony or tooth filing could throw one of our drivers out of commission for three days at a time, and we’d only be informed of this when he didn’t arrive for a pickup, and then only if he left his cellphone on. One of my favorite Balinese words is buung (not happening) which can be more or less invoked at any time, for any reason. It’s a complete explanation, and one need delve no further. What happened to lunch for the cast? Buung. Why didn’t that videographer show up on opening night? Buung. But these were more than offset by all the things that went right, all the extra efforts that we really had no reason to expect.

name
Dewa Ketut Alit and Evan Ziporyn; photo by Christine Southworth

The biggest hero by any measure was Dewa Ketut Alit, himself a brilliant composer, who led the gamelan and taught them to play the two-hour score by memory in my absence. They learned it over the spring from mp3 files, using transcription shareware, which I had convinced Alit would be more useful than the Radio Shack cassette deck he had planned on using. I had heard they were “having trouble,” which could have meant anything. So I arrived in Bali not knowing what to expect, and hoping they’d at least have learned some small fraction of the score. But they had learned three quarters of it, and that they knew better than I did. This kind of thing goes a long way, at least for me. It carried me through the discovery that the curator of the space—the scion of the Ubud royal family—had forgotten we were even coming, and that on being reminded he’d asked if we’d mind terribly if a novelty act—a deaf Balinese dancer, unheard of, and I’m sure quite wonderful in the right context—joined the cast for “just one number.” Or when we found out we had no sound system or generator, and that three of our four Balinese performers had double booked the dates. Or the medical situation: our soprano being hit with what seemed to be swine flu; our violinist arriving and getting Bali belly within 48 hours, our intern/accompanist/prompter’s infected blister rendering him unable to walk for several days. And don’t get me started on the strange coin-sized sores that began covering my own body during the second week. The gamelan rehearsals were the saving grace: whatever else had gone wrong at any particular time, those three hours each day made it all worth it.

Christine and I arrived in early June, spending our afternoons and evenings in rehearsal with the gamelan and our mornings in searches and negotiations for music stands, stage lights, props, etc. The Western singers trickled in one by one and we began staging the piece in a house we had rented for them, overlooking a still-unrafted gorge in very remote village of Sebali, as remote from present day Ubud sprawl as McPhee’s house had been from the tiny village 75 years ago. The house was equal parts gorgeous and dangerous: amazing what you can do without an enforceable building code. The living room simply opened up onto the gorge without a railing: one missed step would literally result in a fatal plunge, though this did make the singers admirably surefooted in performance.

 

4

While staging took place in Sebali, gamelan rehearsals continued in the central Ubud home of Cokorda Putra, a musician relative of the royal family who had also loaned us his instruments. The sound and tuning of the set was unlike any I had ever heard in Bali, and Cok Putra explained that they had been designed by his father, “using a guitar and a trumpet.” I never quite figured out what that had entailed, but I did realize immediately what it meant: however I felt about the sound, this was the set we were using. And it was, in fact, gorgeous, unusual, voluptuous, and resonant. It was also a good minor third away from the tuning I’d had in mind, and with different interval sizes to boot. I had written the piece assuming some degree of variation in the tuning of the gamelan, but presumed that I’d be able to find a set that was more or less in the ballpark. This was partly practical, as there’s no standard tuning in the tradition. The prevalent modes are more like families than formulae, recognizable by traits, resemblances, contexts. The only way to ensure a certain tuning is to insist on it, to build your own instruments a la Partch or Lou Harrison, or else be prepared to take the same set with you anywhere you go. This wouldn’t be a huge expense for, say, the Metropolitan Opera or a major festival, but for us small-timers, it’s out of the question.

Cok Putra clearly loved these instruments, and, given the avuncular interest he’d taken in the project, I knew even looking for alternatives would have not just insulted him but broken his heart. He came to every rehearsal, sitting quietly on the edge of the pavilion. When we rehearsed at night he came in his pajamas. Compared to this, throwing the entire tonal scheme of my opera into disarray was a small price to pay. So I just chalked it up to the magic of Bali. Using these instruments was fate, it would either sound much, much better or much, much worse, and I’d just have to wait with everyone else to find out.

Tuning is, of course, the 800-pound gorilla in the room any time you combine gamelan with Western instruments. It really is fitting square pegs into round holes, and even should a composer or performers choose to ignore the resulting discrepancies, I can assure you an audience does not. I say this from experience. We all “know” that Western tuning is a compromise, a conscious sacrifice of modality in favor of modularity, but I myself never really understood what this meant until, years ago, I gave rudimentary piano lessons to Nyoman Windha, a Balinese composer who was then in residence with Sekar Jaya. At that time he was largely unfamiliar with Western music, though he’s since received an M.A. in composition from Mills College and written very beautifully for his own hybrid ensembles. But this was first contact. I explained transposition to him, demonstrating it by plunking out an approximation of pelog, which I then modulated into a variety of different keys. “I get it,” he finally exclaimed, “You have a dozen pelogs, and they all sound equally bad!”

The tuning problem does, however, have the virtue of salience; it’s right there on the surface, not possible to ignore. I have my own ways of dealing with it compositionally, in my mind it’s almost a jiu jitsu thing, leveraging it to the music’s advantage, even when a monkey wrench is thrown into the equation. More on that in a moment. But equally intriguing are the deeper discrepancies, the parsing of time, the shaping of a phrase, and, most of all, what it means to play as an ensemble. In all of these areas, good Balinese gamelans need bow to no group on earth, anyone can hear this on dozens of recordings. But they seldom play “steady time,” nor do they try to. Kebyar is like a Chopin ballade on speed, played in unison by a group of 25. Time flows, moving with the moment. In my opera I called on the Bang on a Can All-Stars to lock in with this, and they rose to this challenge; but I also called on the young gamelan players to do the opposite, to lock into David Cossin’s rock-steady drum grooves, or to accompany Todd Reynolds’ violin, and this proved to be equally daunting challenge. They had an easier time playing interlocking parts in a breakneck acceleration than in staying in a medium 4/4 lockstep. It’s not technique, but rather sensibility: from their point of view, why would a group choose to play metronomically, to actually aspire to automatism?

I had designed the music to reify the dramatic course of the piece: two separate types of music, which gradually come together, find a temporary synthesis, and then diffuse. I also felt it important to establish each ensemble autonomously, to not have the Western instrument be part of the gamelan or vice versa. Over the course of two hours, I tried to find appropriate ways to conceptualize and realize the relationship between the two ensembles, the two cultures. I hoped this would make the juxtapositions—narrative and musical, technical and expressive—clear and meaningful.

It so happened, however, that the music we first rehearsed together on that first full day was from smack dab in the middle of the opera, where everyone is playing all at once, on more or less equal footing. Imagine that moment when the car radio is on scan and you hit on something that sounds utterly incomprehensible, utter chaos, and five seconds later you realize it’s an Abba tune, only this time it was Ives’ Fourth Symphony, and those five seconds never ended. We slogged through, and everyone put their best face forward, but as the composer, hearing my work complete for the first time, I was dying inside. Cacophony! I had worked for years for this? I had put my faith in the gods, trusting them to have assigned us Cok Putra’s gamelan for a reason, and the gods had let me down. Clearly I had offended them, or more likely they were just onto me. In any case, this was going to be highly embarrassing, a very long week.

Maybe it didn’t sound quite that bad to the musicians, maybe they were being polite, or paying attention to something else (their own parts, for example). No one seemed as freaked out as I was, and in any case, it wouldn’t have been the first time they had played crappy contemporary music. So the moment passed without incident, and though I was broken inside, beyond suicidal, I proposed that since we were just getting to know each other, maybe we should just play through the first three scenes, where, in turn, the All-Stars play alone, accompanying McPhee, then the gamelan plays alone, accompanying two Balinese dancers, and then the two groups finally start to play together as McPhee’s house gets built on stage. What followed was quite possibly the most inspiring 30 minutes of my life, watching each group play for and react to the other. And by the end of it, to my ears at least, the two tunings together sounded great.

You need to understand: I didn’t come to gamelan 30 years ago with the idea of composing for it. In fact, it was the opposite: I came to gamelan to get away from composition altogether, at least for a certain portion of every day. Again, in this there’s a McPhee parallel. He returned to Paris in 1932 and could write no music—this was a problem. But when he came back to Bali shortly thereafter, he no longer cared, he didn’t want to write music anymore, and this only became a problem after he came home and tried to resume his career. In my case, it was neither so binary nor so problematic, but I recognize the syndrome. If you’re a composer, you probably know what I’m talking about. Almost all of us, at least as far as I can tell, experience or at least remember experiencing that anxiety—dare I say it?—of influence. We start writing music for whatever reason, there can be many, but in our culture the composer is the genius, the great man, you’re either Beethoven or you’re wasting your time. And you don’t get to find out until it’s too late. And at a certain point, you realize what a ridiculously high mountain you’re trying to climb, and every moment in front of the computer (or, back in the day, in front of Judy Green vellum) is imbued on some level with stress. You’re desperate to get over it, get beyond it, get back to what made you write music in the first place, whatever that was.

What’s more, once one is in this state, even listening to music becomes burdensome, part of that matrix. What can I learn from this piece? Is my music better or worse? Why didn’t I think of that? Do I deserve to be in the same club as this guy? Have I earned my membership card, or am I just a poseur? But with gamelan, I had no such worries—here was the coolest music I’d ever heard, and it had nothing to do with me! No one expected me to live up to it, to aspire to it, to outdo it. I was free to experience it, learn from it, without feeling any pressure to subsume it into an expression of my own hoped-for genius. Of course, this is the inverse of the alienated outsider feelings I described above—in a way, you can’t have one without the other—so I’m not complaining or extolling, it’s just how it was.

As a result, I studied gamelan for close to ten years before I began to compose for it, mostly in combination with Western instruments. I did this not primarily because I felt the need to hear this combination of sounds—though that would certainly be reason enough—but because after those ten years of blissful apartness, in that respect at least, I began to realize that Balinese music—the sensibility issues discussed above—had seeped into me, at least to some subjective degree. I had spent a lot of time with this music, more than I had spent with Western music when I began composing at age 14. How much longer could I avoid this and still feel that I was bringing everything I had to the table?

Musically and programmatically, I wanted to explore issues of identity and difference, personal and cultural. I wrote Aneh Tapi Nyata for Sekar Jaya to bring to Bali in 1992 because I wanted the group to have a piece that truly demonstrated who we were—Westerners who played mandolin and flute, electric guitar and cello as well as Balinese gamelan. After the 2002 Bali bombing, I wrote Ngaben (“Cremation”) for gamelan and orchestra as a meditation and memorial. I wrote Shadow Bang to provide a vehicle for Balinese puppeteer I Wayan Wija, so that American audiences could possibly experience his artistry directly, in a Western context, rather than filtered through the frame of exoticism and otherness.

This desire to bring musical worlds together extends inward, to the experience of the collaborators themselves. I have played with the All-Stars since 1992, but none of them had been to Bali. They’d all listened to gamelan, of course, but they hadn’t really listened to it, because it didn’t have anything to do with them. The members of Gamelan Salukat know some Western music—they live in the world and hear it on the radio, some even play guitar or drums or whatever—but they similarly hadn’t ever thought of this music as having anything to do with them directly. Sitting in a room together, on a 90-degree day in the center of Ubud, with jackhammers outside the window (they wanted to get the building done before the premiere, a nice touch, given the story of the opera), playing two pieces that were composed to bookend one another, these two amazing ensembles listened to each other in a way they had never listened to these respective types of music before. And something happened, something we all felt. We connected; the room vibrated. Being the composer and instigator, I like to think that this has something to do with what I wrote. But it doesn’t really matter, I’m happy enough to have been there to witness it.

 

5

In a way, everything after that was gravy. Certainly there continued to be ups and downs, unsolvable crises and more divine intervention. There’s a melodrama to production week that seems to be universal; it doesn’t matter if you’re doing a high school musical (or doing High School Musical for that matter) or putting on an opera in Bali. Watch Topsy Turvy or Shakespeare in Love—you’ll get the general idea. Then the performance happens, and if one is open to it, one can seize the moment and feel the vestigial magic, that connection to the sacralized moment that is so present in every moment of Balinese life.

Before the first performance, the entire company went to the temple together to pray and be blessed by a Balinese priest. This is a kind of “Simon Says” situation, but even without a specific god to pray to, it’s a moment of togetherness and meditation. Its meaning is malleable but tangible: the temple itself was also our dressing room, and before the second performance, as I shot the breeze with the temple custodian, I noticed our lead dancer, Dewi Aryani, who among other things had danced for Robert Wilson and made several music videos, slipping off to a corner to pray on her own—nothing unusual about that, but I also noticed our cellist, Felix Fan, slipping off to another corner with his wife Amaty to do the same thing.

name
Members of Gamelan Salukat; photo by Christine Southworth

Conducting my own music, as performed by my favorite musicians, in a space that had so much to do with the shape of my adult life, and that happened to be a temple to the Goddess of Art to boot, one would have to be pretty hard on oneself not to find this a peak experience. The only thing that could possibly ruin it—as with every outdoor performance—would be the weather. And like an admonishing finger from above, a cluster of storm clouds literally circled around the island on both performance dates, always within site but never directly overhead. I was assured by Nyoman Catra—the master masked dancer who had cofounded Galak Tika with me in 1993, and who had restaged the crowd scenes at my behest two days earlier, an old hoofer if there ever was one—that it couldn’t possibly rain. All I could do was take this on faith: even with a drop of rain we’d have risked electrocution and had to cancel. And five minutes before curtain, I saw a drop on the plastic cover sheet of my score.

But Catra was right, or the gods had made their point with the circling clouds. On both nights the rain held off until literally moments after the performance, just long enough to clear the stage and cover the electrical equipment. On the last night we all rode up to a cast party, hosted by new friends in a ‘villa’ on Sayan ridge itself, a stone’s throw from McPhee’s house site. Staring across the river, where McPhee himself had seen the lights of the lèyak demons, Nyoman Usadhi, the 13-year-old who played McPhee’s protégé Sampih, saw the lights of the Four Seasons Resort. “Is that a hotel?” he asked…

***

Composer/clarinetist Evan Ziporyn is a founding member of the Bang on a Can All-Stars, with whom he has toured the globe since 1992, as well as the Founder and Artistic Director of Boston’s Gamelan Galak Tika, a group dedicated to new music for Balinese gamelan, which he has studied for almost 30 years. His music has been commissioned and performed by the Kronos Quartet, Wu Man, the American Composers Orchestra, the American Repertory Theater, Maya Beiser, So Percussion, and the Boston Modern Orchestra Project, with whom he recorded his 2006 orchestral CD, Frog’s Eye. Since 1990, he has composed a series of cross-cultural works, combining gamelan with saxophones, guitars, electronics, Chinese and African instruments, and full orchestra.

On Record – An Overview of the State of Contemporary Music Recording (Part 3): The Digital Domain

[Ed. Note: This article is the third and final installment in a three-part series exploring the state of contemporary music recordings. Part one is a survey of U.S.-based labels who still regularly release CD recordings featuring new American music; part two examines the current economic realities of the business.]

Is the CD format dead? Not at all, according to the label managers contacted for this story. It’s not even on life support, they said. Still, nobody is ignoring the increasingly important realm of digital downloads.

Contrary to some perceptions, new technologies don’t frighten record companies, at least not the little ones. Certainly the internet has become a lifeline for the business of selling CDs of contemporary music. Websites allow customers to search out obscure composers and browse deep catalog in a way never before possible, even when big record stores were still around. And email has tremendously eased communication with foreign distributors.

Without exception each label manager contacted for this story has some or all of his or her catalog available for download, often at a number of different sites. The plethora of online venues out there—iTunes, eMusic, and Amazon are just the beginning—has led to a new middleman in the business. Digital distributors sign record labels and provide their recordings to websites, where they can be sold for download, in the same way that old-fashioned retail distributors are the go-between for labels to reach retailers. Probably the leading digital distributor is IODA, the Independent Online Distribution Alliance, which provides tracks to several dozen sites, including Classical.com, Rhapsody, Zune, and Verizon Wireless, to name but a few.

If the final days of the CD are not eagerly anticipated by label managers, it’s still a topic for contemplation and ongoing discussion.

Earlier this year, James Ginsberg of Cedille was asked to speak on a panel about the future of recorded media at a Chicago conference of the Music Library Association. There was nothing particularly bold or newsworthy when Ginsberg said to the group, “In the next decade, the CD will become to downloading what the LP became to the CD in the 1980s.” But he hastened to add, “Our production practices won’t change at all. We’ll continue to produce recordings of the highest quality of which we are capable.”

Such statements may be self-evident at this point, but a lot of details remain unsettled. Ginsberg’s colleagues express a wide variety of insights and concerns about the current importance of downloading and what needs to happen before it becomes the dominant or exclusive vehicle for sales and distribution of contemporary music.

name
The website for Mode Records is as graphically compelling as their CD covers, but the site’s merchandise remains physical CDs.

Brian Brandt at Mode says that downloads have grown but “are not quite making up the slack in CD sales” brought about from the disappearance of stores. Al Margolis, who manages Pogus, XI, Deep Listening and Mutable Music, agrees and says, “Early on digital was extra money, but now (those funds) are needed.”

Margolis says he has artists who swear by downloads but also insist upon having a physical CD of their music. While expressing a bit of nostalgia himself, Margolis looks forward to how downloading will alleviate the difficulty of maintaining inventories of slow-selling product and also solve the regularly occurring dilemma of whether or not to repress older titles when stock gets depleted. “What do you do with titles that are 10, 11, 12, or 15 years old and finally selling out? Do you let them go out of print or make another 1,000 pieces?”

“Two things still have to happen” for digital downloads to become the norm, says Susan Bush of Albany. The first, she says, is greater acceptance of the technology. “There are people who don’t know how or don’t want to know how to use a computer. But that’s almost always a function of age and will decrease over time. The other thing is that downloads must improve in sound quality and speed. That will make the shift to digital complete. But we’ll probably still do some CDs, just one at a time.”

Becky Starobin at Bridge also notes the continued need for hard product and expresses concern about sound degradation.

“CDs are still very important, not only because of the actual physical sales which are holding steady, but also because it’s useful for composers and performers to have physical product available at concerts,” she says. “And it’s important for people to hear, especially in particularly complex music, a format that gives the full palette of sound. It works against the music to hear it in the diminished quality that you get by lower resolution and listening with ear buds.”

It’s the loss of liner notes and photos that concerns Charles Amirkhanian of Other Minds. “We need to find a way to have booklets and other printed materials downloadable and easily printed. It’s no fun to sit around and download and print these materials (the way it is now). It’s cheaper and easier to buy them as a kit. I think that’s an age thing and an intellectual thing,” he says. “Everything on my label is available on digital download and the income from that goes up each year, but it’s still not substantial. There may not be many brick-and-mortar stores, but people are still buying CDs all over the world.”

When or if CDs disappear, there will still be a need for record labels, according to Paul Tai of New World. “Anybody can set up a shop on the web and hock their stuff,” he says. “But there’s hundreds or thousands doing that already, so how do you make yourself heard? Labels provide the platform. We still have a certain authority and people will pay attention if you’re on New World or Bridge or Mode or Albany.”

*

Perhaps the largest platform for recordings of American music is the Naxos American Classics line. But it’s a relatively minor subset within the 22-year-old company founded by German-born Klaus Heymann, who lives in Hong Kong. A multi-million dollar behemoth, Naxos is nevertheless known as a “budget” label, since its sales price is $8.99 for CDs (or $5.99 for album-length downloads at iTunes).

name
The Naxos Music Library makes available to subscribers more than 492,600 tracks of music culled from over 34,610 CDs, with 500 new CDs added every month.

Composer Sean Hickey is the national sales and business development manager for Naxos’s U.S. operations. Working out of his home in Brooklyn, he supervises a sophisticated online marketing apparatus for new releases and is part of an international committee that decides what’s to be released on the American Classics imprint. Begun 12 years ago, the series features about 300 titles, including big orchestral recordings of Adams, Glass, and Corigliano, as well as Harris, Ives, and Thomson. But there are also discs of chamber and solo music by Paul Moravec, Roberto Sierra, and Leon Kirchner, plus band music of Sousa, piano works of MacDowell, and on and on.

“We look for things that will sell and things that will augment the catalog in a meaningful way,” says Hickey of the American Classics line. “We also want relationships with ensembles or composers or artists who are able to help spread the message of the release. We develop a ton of marketing materials, none more so than with the American Classics.” These include the weekly Naxos podcast, which Hickey says is the most popular classical music podcast, plus “interactive e-cards,” basically emails about new titles with links to streaming videos, sound samples, and the like.

Besides having a variety of in-house series, like American Classics, Naxos is a distributor in both retail and digital realms, and it maintains the Naxos Music Library. The latter provides subscribers with access to more than 450,000 tracks of music from more than 30,000 CDs, the majority on Naxos but also from other independent labels as well. (The tracks are available for streaming, which in contrast to downloading prevents the user from saving the recording on a hard drive or burning it to a CD.)

According to Hickey, The Naxos Music Library has a subscriber base of more than 1,200 institutions, most of them colleges and universities. Students from these schools are allowed full access to the library—bringing the total individual users to around 100,000. Frequently professors provide playlists as part of the curriculum for music courses. Such penetration to young listeners has meant that Naxos’s reputation as an online provider has largely overtaken its once dominant presence in stores.

“I’ve been in this business 16 or 17 years now and came to know Naxos through record stores and those seas of white covers,” says Hickey. “But now people in their 20s don’t have that reference. At this year’s American Library Association convention, the Naxos Music Library manager had a display of compact discs and three different people come up and said, ‘I didn’t know you did CDs.'”

name
DRAM, a subscription service available only to institutions, offers tracks from 2,300 albums from 15 independent labels.

A corollary to the Naxos library that began with an exclusively American music focus is DRAM. (Originally an acronym for Database of Recorded American Music, its purview of material has expanded beyond the United States since its founding in 2001, and so the name is simply DRAM.) It is administered by New World Records and subscriptions are available to institutions only, whereas the Naxos library also makes subscriptions available to individuals.

Comprised of 2,300 albums, DRAM includes the full catalogs of New World, CRI, and a dozen or so other independent labels. In April, DRAM added to its holdings for the first time a complete archive of one composer’s music—that of electronic music composer Jon Appleton, through an agreement with Dartmouth College.

As the DRAM website states, the idea of a streaming library of digital recordings allows institutions “to free up storage space, reduce collection costs and labor, ensure against damage or loss and increase accessibility to materials.” These are benefits that surely will appeal to an increasing number of consumers over time.

Net labels—record labels with no records, so to speak—actually already exist in profusion in the realm of ambient/electronic music. It’s a natural place for such a movement to start, since electronic music doesn’t require costly recording sessions with pesky live musicians. The composer is the performer, and the composition and the master are the same.

name
Disquiet is an online portal for electronic music disseminated via mp3s.

Marc Weidenbaum, a San Francisco writer and editor is an avid follower of this cyber scene, which he chronicles on his blog Disquiet.com. “Net labels are an amazing expression of enthusiasm for making content and sharing what you do,” he says.

According to Weidenbaum, some net labels do charge for downloads but streaming music for free is the norm. “With mp3 files you have to put them on a device, but now I can stream things on my iPhone or on the Android Phone, so the difference has become moot,” says Weidenbaum. “A lot of record labels have essentially become radio stations because you go to their websites and they’re streaming audio of their hits. They think of it as marketing, but at some point they may realize it’s providing an experience.”

name
The “cover art” for the album Drone Level Orange by improvising ensemble Glissando Bin Laden, which has been released only as mp3 downloads made available to listeners with or without a donation on Carrier Records.

Weidenbaum’s thinking goes even further, but his vision of completely free access to music may provide little solace to composers or label managers. “Truly outward bound artistic expression is usually not financially rewarding,” he says. “People learn that the music they love does not lead to fortune. Once you take money off the table, it becomes a more open opportunity.”

“I interviewed John Zorn when he left Nonesuch, about 17 years ago,” continues Weidenbaum, “and he said there’s a difference between loving music and loving records.”

That’s a distinction that all of us will soon be confronting.

***

name
Joseph Dalton
Photo by Timothy Cahill

Joseph Dalton has been covering the arts scene in New York’s Capital Region since 2002, primarily writing for the Albany Times Union. Many of these essays have been collected in the book Artists & Activists: Making Culture in New York’s Capital Region, published in 2008. Dalton is the former executive director of Composers Recordings, Inc. (CRI), where he produced about 300 recordings of contemporary music. He was also director of a research project on the effects of AIDS on American music which was published in an online report by the Estate Project for Artists with AIDS.

On Record – An Overview of the State of Contemporary Music Recording (Part 2): Not-Profit Even If Not By Design

[Ed. Note: This article is the second in a three-part series exploring the state of contemporary music recordings which concludes with an exploration of online distribution and dissemination. Part One focuses on labels which still issue physical CDs]

Given that thousands of new CD titles are produced every year across the span of musical genres, it’s not hard to surmise that most discs don’t earn back enough funds to recoup the costs of recording and manufacturing. In other words, it can’t be just classical and contemporary music projects that have modest sales.

It’s a given: money has to come from somewhere before discs get released. It’s just that the need for dough is more on the surface in all realms of the always-struggling little realm of contemporary American music.

At New Amsterdam Records, the ambitious young proprietors may be forging new ground by releasing discs of music that blends popular and classical styles in fresh ways. But during our interview when they addressed finances—making statements like “We don’t want to create a situation where the success of one project supports another one” and “We contribute a minimal amount of funding and are very wary of functioning like a bank” and “We’re not assuming the costs”—they gave the impression of viewing themselves as boldly operating counter to industry standards. Compared to popular music labels that may well be the case.

Yet scraping together the money to produce each new title and more often than not looking to the artists to help with that process—whether from family wealth, university research grants, or credit card debt—is standard operating procedure at almost every independent contemporary music label. On one level, at least, New Amsterdam does acknowledge this, since the company is in the process of becoming a nonprofit organization, which will allow it to receive grants and contributions.

Where the Discs Are

The following labels maintain an active release schedule which includes CD recordings of contemporary American music:

Albany Records
Arabesque Recordings
ArpaViva
Arsis Audio
Azica Records
BMOP Sound
Brassland Records
Bridge Records
Cambria Music
Cantaloupe
Cedille Records
Centaur Records
Cold Blue Music
Crystal Records
Crytogramophone
Deep Listening
Delos Music
Ears & Eyes Records
Einstein Records
EMF Media
ERM Media
Furious Artisans
GM Recordings
Image Recordings
Innova
Koch International Classics
Koss Classics
Lovely Music, Ltd.
Mode Records
MSR
Musica Omnia
Mutable Music
Navona Records
Naxos
Neuma Records
New Albion Records
New Amsterdam Records
New Focus Recordings
New World Records
Newport Classics
North South Records
OgreOgress Productions
Orange Mountain
Other Minds
Peacock Recordings
Phoenix
Pierian
Pogus Productions
Present Sounds
Quiet Design
Skirl Records
Starkland
Summit Records
3Sixteen Records
Table of the Elements
Tzadik
XI Records

“Aren’t we all non-profit?” jokes Susan Napodano DelGiorno of Koch International Classics, which is based on Long Island. Actually her operation is among the labels with a long-term commitment to new music that’s not non-profit, at least strictly speaking. A boutique within the larger media corporation of E1 Entertainment, which purchased Koch Records last year, the classical imprint is in the process of being rechristened E1 Classics.

According to DelGiorno, the label put out 31 new titles in 2007, 21 titles in 2008, and will release 23 projects this year. Roughly half the releases are contemporary music, of one sort or another. Practically speaking, DelGiorno is a sole proprietor. She decides on projects, produces the sessions, edits the masters, and supervises the packaging, even while working with the company’s larger marketing and distribution wings. Recent releases include flute music of Jennifer Higdon and orchestral music of George Tsontakis with the Albany Symphony Orchestra. In the works, among other things, is a disc with the young classical/jazz improvisation trio known as Time for Three.

name
A recent Koch International Classics release featuring music from Barber to DBR

DelGiorno hesitated to give a direct answer to the question of whether or not her operation was expected to be self-supporting. She did say, “Other divisions bolster what I do, but I still have the responsibility to make wise decisions, and we approach each project with the idea of making a small profit. We’d like to think of making a million dollars, but we all know that doesn’t happen.”

Fifty miles north of New York City in the small town of Chester, Al Margolis is a one-man record conglomerate. (Yes, that’s a grand distinction, but we’re talking about avant-garde music here.)

Margolis is the label manager for four little independents: Pogus, which he established in 1988; XI Records, founded by composer Phill Niblock in 1990; Deep Listening, launched by composer Pauline Oliveros in 1995; and Mutable Music, started by baritone Thomas Buckner in 2000 (who also ran 1750 Arch during the LP era). Each label is curated by its founder, but once masters are completed Margolis supervises the production process, and also manages the websites and does the shipping. He also distributes product of at least two other labels, the defunct O.O. Discs and the inactive Nonsequitur, curated by Steve Peters.

name
Pogus’s 3-CD re-issue of recordings originally published in Source magazine was years in the making.

Asked why there are so darned many labels in the field, Margolis explains, “Every label is a reflection of who’s running it. It’s not egotistical, but it’s their own little space to say, ‘This is what I do.'”

A veteran of the business, Margolis had an eight-year tenure at New World Records, where he rose from shipping clerk to production manager to director of artists and repertoire before leaving in 2001. Though today he has to juggle myriad tasks, he doesn’t miss the two-hour commute to Manhattan and now has time to devote to his own work as a sound artist.

Despite his rather rural location, Margolis is hardly isolated from the trends and economics of the industry. “It’s gotten tougher and tougher, but we’re hanging in there. This section of the business isn’t ready to give up yet,” he says.

Perhaps it’s his time out of the city, but Margolis has a laid-back approach to sales. “I’ve found I make more money the less I try to sell recordings, going crazy with advertisements and lots of promotions. Those don’t sell records anymore. You can have the best review and it doesn’t move ’em at all. It’s an organic thing that continues at its own pace. For the records that are going to sell, you don’t have to do a damn thing.”

As for the pace of new titles, it depends upon the success of in-house fundraising and initiatives from artists. “We manage to get some grants occasionally. Some money comes from the artists,” says Margolis matter-of-factly.

Another relatively recent transplant to the Hudson Valley is Foster Reed, founder of New Albion Records. Established in 1984 in San Francisco, New Albion often projected a kind of West Coast mystique with early releases of Lou Harrison, John Adams, and Somei Satoh. But also along the way were discs of East Coast denizens like Morton Feldman, Pauline Oliveros, and even Virgil Thomson. A native of Stockbridge, Massachusetts, Reed says that he never intended to stay in the Bay Area for the 30 years that he did and about five years ago he finally picked up and moved his family to rural Duchess County.

Last summer New Albion made something of a splash in its new environs by producing a festival of ten concerts as part of the Summerscape series at Bard College. The line-up was a veritable retrospective of important repertoire on the label and included performances by pianists Sarah Cahill and Margaret Leng-Tan, soprano Joan LaBarbara and the Able-Steinberg-Winant Trio, as well as an installation/performance by Ellen Fullman and her “long stringed instruments” in the lobby of the Frank Gehry-designed Fisher Center for the Performing Arts. An early celebration of the label’s 25th anniversary, the events may have also been a kind of farewell because last summer, New Albion released what may be its final disc (piano music of Leo Ornstein played by Cahill).

name
No new New Albion titles have been issued since Sarah Cahill’s premiere recordings of later Leo Ornstein works was released last year.

“Right now the label doesn’t seem to have the necessity for being that it used to,” says Reed. “Other labels are covering the same kind of territory I was involved in and doing a very credible job. When I started New Albion there was little peer activity. So I’m just not making new records. That used to be a huge activity and so involving, but we are doing occasional productions and actively licensing.” These ancillary activities include a Terry Riley weekend planned for October at Bard and some Hollywood soundtrack deals that are in the early stages of talks. Reed also says he’s “still learning the ropes of the new world,” referring to the vast online universe.

“If music is to be heard and the point of a record label is to help more people hear it, then things have never been more successful. Because of the streaming libraries, there are phenomenal amounts of people listening today. But the business dynamic is worse than ever,” continues Reed. New Albion was started with some family money and Reed emphasizes that in the best of times it barely supported itself. Still, he’s not about to close up shop. Concludes Reed, “The doors are still open and if things change, I wouldn’t be averse to making new recordings. We sell records to whomever wants to buy them still and the licensing is pretty good. And if one of the big publishers wanted to buy us for a million dollars I’d sell it.”

*

Whether or not a label has non-profit documentation is not in itself a barrier to receiving outside support for projects. Artists can channel personal funds to a label and consider it a business expense, or a label can, in effect, co-produce a project with an ensemble, which can raise grant funding and contributions.

A few foundations have come around to understanding the importance of recordings to the field of contemporary music. Starting in the late 1980s, the Mary Flagler Cary Charitable Trust ran a program specifically for recordings of New York-based ensembles, with most of the funds going toward contemporary music endeavors. Some years back, the Cary’s recording program and a concurrent commissioning program were rolled into one umbrella program for contemporary music projects. According to tax filings, in 2008 the Cary Trusts gave $1.6 million to 60 music organizations based in New York City. Sadly the Cary Trust, after some 40 years of operation, shut down on June 30, 2009. The fund has liquidated its portfolio of investment holdings and made final awards—larger than normal sums to long-term grantees—which have been posted on Cary’s website. [Ed. note: One of these grants endows a recording component of the American Music Center’s Composer Assistance Program (CAP), but it will take a year or two for the endowment to yield sufficient investment proceeds to launch; further details have yet to be announced.]

Over the past five years the Argosy Foundation of Milwaukee has become a major supporter of contemporary music activities nationwide. The fund was established in 1997 by John Abele, an entrepreneur who co-founded Boston Scientific, a manufacturer of medical devices like heart stents and catheters. In 2008 Forbes Magazine named Abele one of the 400 richest Americans. His son, Alexander Abele, is a 40-year-old composer based in Burlington, Vermont. As he is one of only five Argosy trustees (all are members of the Argosy family), it seems reasonable to conclude that Alex Abele was responsible for the launch of the foundation’s grant making for commissions and training, performances, and recordings of new American music.

Argosy’s annual reports do not break down the total giving by area of support (there are seven broad programmatic areas, including education, health, and the environment, in addition to the arts) and while lists of grantees are provided, award amounts are not. But the aggregate is still impressive. In 2006, Argosy made 263 grants totaling about $24.5 million and of these 69 grants were for contemporary music projects. In 2007, the total giving declined slightly to $20.2 million while the total number of grants rose to 346, with 158 grants to orchestras and chamber ensembles, festivals, and record labels.

The contemporary music program operates with semi-annual deadlines and the restriction that recipient organizations are limited to grants every other year. It is the only area where the foundation accepts unsolicited applications; awards can range from $1,000 to $25,000. A foundation officer said that approximately 42 percent of all grants made toward contemporary music to date have included recordings as at least an aspect of the supported project.

The past year’s decline in the stock market seems to have hit the Argosy Foundation particularly hard, and Boston Scientific has also had some struggles with lawsuits and expensive acquisitions of other companies. As a result, the spring 2009 grant cycle for contemporary music programs was canceled and, according to the foundation’s website, the status of the fall program is uncertain but will be announced by late summer. A program officer declined to elaborate further.

Given the permanent departure of the Cary Trust and the at-least temporary absence of the Argosy Foundation, there’s concern in the field regarding the status of the Aaron Copland Fund for Music—the mothership of contemporary music grant makers. Established in 1992 by the estate of the late composer, the Copland Fund supports American music through three separate granting programs: one each for performing organizations, recording projects, and service organizations. Annual giving has been in the range of $2 million. Support for recordings in recent years has been relatively steady, with $500,000 going to 51 projects in 2006; $321,750 to 40 projects in 2007; and $419,800 to 39 projects in 2008. And it is not just nonprofits that can apply to the Copland Fund’s recording program. Just last year Nonesuch Records, part of the Warner Music Group, received two of the largest grants ($20,000 each) for recordings of Steve Reich and John Adams.

According to Foundation president John Harbison, the 2009 recording awards will be be announced soon and the total of grants will continue in the range of recent years. Harbison was reticent, however, to make predictions about the future giving potential of the Fund, saying that the amount dedicated to each program is determined annually by the trustees.

But the vagaries of Wall Street probably aren’t having the same dire effect on the Copland Fund’s ability to make grants in the near future as they have at other foundations. This is because Aaron Copland’s will left the majority of his copyrights to the foundation. According to tax returns for 2006 and 2007, roughly $2 million in royalties was received each year—a sum roughly equal to the amount of grants made. Contrast this to how most foundations operate, which is by divvying up grants from the earnings on investments. Nevertheless, the Copland Fund does also have investments, which were valued at about $20 million at the end of 2007.

Thus, when label managers put on their fundraiser hats, they can take heart that the Copland Fund should be continuing apace with its support for recordings. Harbison, by the way, added, “the reason that the average amounts of grants may have gone down somewhat is because the number of applications have increased. We’re always quite administratively pressed to respond to the volume of requests.” While he was probably speaking of all the Fund’s programs, this still underscores the point that there remains in the field a strong desire to produce recordings.

The kind of endowments held by cultural behemoths like the Metropolitan Opera and some major orchestras are unheard of among record labels as well as within the entire realm of contemporary music, for that matter. But three well-established labels, each in a different region of the country, have reliable internal or closely aligned sources of support that serve as hedges against changes in the economic environment and shifting trends in the marketplace.

In 2002, the American Composers Forum received a $1 million gift from the McKnight Foundation as a permanent endowment for innova Recordings. According to innova’s Philip Blackburn, every recording project still needs outside support, but the associated costs for administration are covered by income from the endowment.

name
Margaret Lancaster’s collection of maverick flute music is hot off the presses from New World Records.

Founded in 1976, New World Records had for many years as its chairman of the board Francis Goelet, a real estate heir and treasured friend to American composers. Goelet died in 1998, but the label still places Goelet’s name at the top of its list of trustees and the funding credits for nearly every New World disc include the Francis W. Goelet Lead Charitable Trust. According to New World’s Paul Tai, support from the Goelet Fund is the final cap that makes many new releases possible.

Finally, there’s Cedille Recordings, founded in Chicago 20 years ago by James Ginsberg, who at the time was a 24-year-old law student. Within a few years, the organization became a non-profit under the name Chicago Classical Recording Foundation with the mission of “promoting the finest musicians, ensembles, and composers in the Chicago area” through high-quality recordings. “It seemed like all the labels were based in New York or the West Coast, and so the artists out here were being ignored.” Last year Cedille produced seven new discs and ten are slated for 2009. Ginsberg estimates that about half of the label’s catalog of nearly 120 discs are of contemporary music.

name
Cedille Records’ just released collection of David Diamond chamber music.

Cedille’s Chicago focus is broadly interpreted. For example, there are solo and ensemble performances by members of the Chicago Symphony and discs of the Grant Park Orchestra playing music of Aaron Jay Kernis and Robert Kurka. But Chicago conductor Paul Freeman also records for Cedille with European orchestras, and there’s a series of recordings of violinist Jennifer Koh, a Chicago native who lives in New York.

Besides drawing on musicians and composers of Chicago residency or origin, Cedille receives support from many local funders. But approximately one-third of the label’s annual budget of roughly $1 million comes from Ginsberg’s father, Martin D. Ginsberg. The senior Ginsberg is a tax attorney and co-author of an authoritative guide to mergers, acquisitions, and buyouts. A new and updated edition comes out annually and Ginsberg has assigned half his royalty income to Cedille. The mother of the family, by the way, is Ruth Bader Ginsberg, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s said that Cedille recordings are regularly passed along the halls of the highest court. Now there’s a word of mouth network no other label can provide.

[Continue reading here.]

***

name
Joseph Dalton
Photo by Timothy Cahill

Joseph Dalton has been covering the arts scene in New York’s Capital Region since 2002, primarily writing for the Albany Times Union. Many of these essays have been collected in the book Artists & Activists: Making Culture in New York’s Capital Region, published in 2008. Dalton is the former executive director of Composers Recordings, Inc. (CRI), where he produced about 300 recordings of contemporary music. He was also director of a research project on the effects of AIDS on American music which was published in an online report by the Estate Project for Artists with AIDS.

On Record – An Overview of the State of Contemporary Music Recording (Part 1): Still Spinning

[Ed. Note: This article, which is the first in a three-part series exploring the state of contemporary music recordings, surveys labels which are still issuing physical CDs. The second installment looks at the current economics for recording labels; and the third and final installment explores digital distribution and dissemination.]

“I am distressed about my CD sales, which have completely tanked. I talked to the head of my label about this, and he told me, ‘No one’s buying CDs.’ In effect, he said, ‘What makes you think you’re special?’ Everybody’s collapsing.”

—composer John Adams, Newsweek, February 5, 2009

“The recording industry is kaput.”

—violinist Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg, Times Union (Albany, NY), February 8, 2007

You’ve heard the talk from lesser lights than these. It’s said over and again: recordings are over and done with… except for all those CDs that keep getting released every month. It’s similar to the even more familiar drone that nobody ever listens to contemporary music… except there’s so much of it around all the time.

Certainly record stores are almost a thing of the past, with Tower Records and Virgin Megastores shuttered. Oh sure, there’s still the music departments at Barnes & Noble and Borders, but just try to find much of a selection of contemporary music there. And the big multinational labels, which stars like Adams and Salerno-Sonnenberg once counted on, have indeed cut their artist rosters, slashed their recording budgets, and drastically curtailed their release schedules. Those operations, of course, are arms of corporations far more dependent upon mass sales of pop music to iPod-toting, file-sharing young people than on the always modest-sized audiences for symphonies, concertos, and string quartets, whether of new or old vintage.

name
A recent innova disc featuring solo piano works by 13 American composers

But in the less heady realm of small independent labels that are devoted exclusively or primarily to contemporary music, there are still plenty of new titles coming out every month, and still primarily on CDs. In fact, a characteristic sense of perseverance and sometimes even some guarded optimism came through in recent interviews with a dozen managers of these plucky outfits.

The sense of the field garnered from researching this story brought to mind some recent casual conversations with small business owners in upstate New York, where I’ve lived for the past eight years.

Where the Discs Are

The following labels maintain an active release schedule which includes CD recordings of contemporary American music:

Albany Records
Arabesque Recordings
ArpaViva
Arsis Audio
Azica Records
BMOP Sound
Brassland Records
Bridge Records
Cambria Music
Cantaloupe
Cedille Records
Centaur Records
Cold Blue Music
Crystal Records
Crytogramophone
Deep Listening
Delos Music
Ears & Eyes Records
Einstein Records
EMF Media
ERM Media
Furious Artisans
GM Recordings
Image Recordings
Innova
Koch International Classics
Koss Classics
Lovely Music, Ltd.
Mode Records
MSR
Musica Omnia
Mutable Music
Navona Records
Naxos
Neuma Records
New Albion Records
New Amsterdam Records
New Focus Recordings
New World Records
Newport Classics
North South Records
OgreOgress Productions
Orange Mountain
Other Minds
Peacock Recordings
Phoenix
Pierian
Pogus Productions
Present Sounds
Quiet Design
Skirl Records
Starkland
Summit Records
3Sixteen Records
Table of the Elements
Tzadik
XI Records

Because the economic boom never really came to this rather removed territory, the bust isn’t being felt too strongly either. So it is with the recordings of new music.

“Business is booming and crackling,” says Philip Blackburn, the composer who runs Innova Recordings, the 25-year-old recording arm of the American Composers Forum, based in Minnesota. “My desk is covered in submissions and my spare time in and out of the office is spent listening to them as well as catching up on infrastructure things.”

Rather than looking to sales, Blackburn’s barometer for business is typical of many who run independent labels: the demand from artists who want to make recordings. Innova is actually one of the surprisingly few labels with nonprofit status. But whatever their legal structure, most labels dedicated to contemporary music have as their first business focus the regular production of new titles; the subsequent sales of those discs is a secondary concern. Thus, a continual flow of new projects and the obtaining of funding to make them happen are essential. At Innova, 28 new titles were released last year and 23 are in the works for 2009. And the sales? Iffy, as always.

“It’s a scramble to keep up with how things are changing,” continues Blackburn. “Getting reviews and radio play that will get people to buy something, that’s always been a long shot.”

“Business is going very well,” says Becky Starobin, who with her husband, the guitarist David Starobin, founded Bridge Records in 1981. “Orders are increasing, and our distribution network is expanding. We’re getting more inquiries from different countries, which is quite remarkable in this climate. In addition to the major markets, we are now entering into agreements with smaller countries.”

Starobin says that roughly 40 percent of Bridge titles are devoted to contemporary music, with the remainder consisting of baroque, classical, romantic, early 20th century, jazz, and world music. For 2009, there are 38 CDs slated for release. Just two years ago the annual release schedule was 30 titles.

name
The most recent installment of Bridge’s ongoing George Crumb series

“There has been a steady growth of interest,” says Starobin. “I don’t think we have experienced a boom since the late ’80s and early ’90s, but Bridge has certainly not experienced a bust. There are different avenues of distribution opening up, and it’s our goal to make the music available to more and more people.”

“We’re holding our own,” says Susan Bush of Albany Records, which was founded by Peter Kermani in 1987. Bush gets a palpable sense of the need to make recordings from artists, when eight to twelve submissions arrive just about every month. The label accepts about 60 percent of what comes in, she says. But that rate is nearly double what it was a few years ago because so many artists are returning to make second, third, and fourth projects with Albany. “We are working with people that we already know, who are sort of our stable of composers and performers,” explains Bush.

Of course not every label operating today is sure and steady in its operations. Many are sole proprietorships dependent upon occasional grants and contributions as well as on the founder’s continual infusions of time and interest.

Keeping an eye on new music recordings has always included watching the labels come and go. For a trip down memory lane, check out American Music Recordings: A Discography of 20th Century U.S. Composers, a nearly 400-page tome edited by Carol Oja and released in 1982 by the Institute for Studies in American Music (recently renamed The H. Wiley Hitchcock Institute for Studies in American Music). Along with numerous citations of recordings on Victor, RCA, Columbia, and MGM—ah, the glory days when major labels cared!—there are also some long departed smaller operations like Desto, Turnabout, and Orion.

The last decade has also seen its share of failures in the field, including the venerable Composers Recordings Inc., which had an honorable run from 1954 to 2003. (Full disclosure: I ran CRI from 1990 to 2000.) The catalog of CRI, including about 400 LPs and 300 CDs, is currently administered by New World Records. New World has thus far released eleven CD reissues of CRI titles, and the remainder of the CRI CD catalog is available through burn-on-demand CDs via the New World website.

Some labels born during the CD era have already come and gone. Composer Joseph Celli founded O.O. Discs in the mid-’90s and once maintained a rather active production schedule, but it was shuttered a number of years ago. And last year composer Richard Brooks brought to a close his Capstone Records, which he founded in 1985. In a brief recent email exchange, I asked Brooks whether his action was a retirement or just giving up. “A little of both,” he replied. The Capstone imprint and its back catalog have been picked up by Parma Recordings, which also has two others labels, Navano for classics and Soundbrush for jazz and world.

In preparing the list of labels that accompanies this article, email inquiries were sent to about 60 labels in order to ascertain their level of current activity. At least half the companies never responded. Overly stringent email filters and the busy and distracted lives of composer/performer/entrepreneurs are understandable, so if the label had a relatively current website, we included them on the list. Still, some companies seem to be missing in action or dormant. The Santa Fe Music Group, which was primarily devoted to reissuing on CD the analog era recordings of the Louisville Orchestra couldn’t be found. Opus One has a shell of a web site. And the “new” releases on Newport Classic’s site appear to be two to three years old, based on cross references to Amazon. So it goes.

The steadfastness, both emotional and financial, necessary to keep a label going may be hard won, but the artistic vision and ambition to start one are easily had. Likewise, the learning curve to produce presentable discs and booklets is not steep. Thus, the menu of labels continues to expand.

There have always been record collectors who, late in life, spend some of their savings to finally take their crack at being “record men.” And plenty of composers have set up shop over the years, including Gunther Schuller with GM Recordings in 1981, Max Lifchitz with North/South in 1992, and John Zorn with Tzadik in 1995.

name
Other Minds’ latest rediscovery: chamber music of Marc Blitzstein

Many of the latest entries into the field emerged from an existing music organization or emerging artistic scene. In San Francisco, Other Minds Records was launched in 1998 as an outgrowth of the then six-year-old Other Minds Festival. Composer Charles Amirkhanian uses an oft-repeated term when describing the value of recordings: “The CDs doubled as calling cards,” he says, adding that they were first used as premium gifts for donors. Beyond its use a promotional vehicle for the festival, Amikhanian’s rationale for the label is also a familiar refrain among those who decide to start their own shop: “We realized that a number of really interesting kinds of music were falling between the cracks and that no one else was going to release them.” While the Other Minds Festival presents living composers, often performing their own works, Other Minds Records, now with 17 titles, has hewed toward rare and out of print repertoire, such as recordings of the late George Antheil performing his own music, the player piano rolls of Conlon Nancarrow (reissued from 1750 Arch), and the most recent release featuring early works of Marc Blitzstein.

Last year conductor Gil Rose and his 12-year-old Boston Modern Orchestra Project decided it was time to strike out on their own after making some 20 recordings for other labels. “We were conceiving the CDs and raising the money, doing the rehearsing and performing, as well as the recording and post production, and then handing off the masters for nothing or very little compared to what the costs were in cash and blood, sweat, and tears,” says Rose. “The final straw came when we started doing the cover designs, which we asked to do because we were getting some unattractive covers.”

name
BMOP’s larger than usual CD packs offer more room for graphics and booklet notes

BMOP/sound already has 12 titles, each attractively presented in cardboard packaging, and each presenting the work of a single composer. They include music of Charles Fussell, Derek Bermel, Lee Hyla, and David Rakowski. And the label is committed to an on-going release schedule of one new disc per month. While Rose likes the comparison to the Louisville Orchestra’s trenchant recording work during the LP era, he concedes that not every project features big orchestral pieces, though the growing catalog already includes operas by John Harbison and Eric Sawyer. “[The label] mirrors the BMOP mission. I stuck this word ‘project’ in the name and I still get flack for it, but I wanted to convey that we’re fluid and flexible. At BMOP performances, sometimes there are 90 people on stage and sometimes 15, and sometimes that’s in the same concert. It’s a very chameleon-like ensemble,” explains Rose. “You can send CDs all over the world, but you can’t get everyone into Jordan Hall. The label has expanded our network and visibility in almost every way.”

From the latest generation of composer/performers in New York comes New Amsterdam Records, founded by William Brittelle, Judd Greenstein, and Sarah Kirkland Snider, all composers in their early 30s with advanced degrees in music. They’ve been busy, releasing 16 discs in less than two years. Some of the latest titles include Darcy James Argue’s Infernal Machines, featuring his 18-piece “steampunk big band” Secret Society, and Brittelle’s own Mohair Time Warp, with the composer singing above a hyperactive mix of amplified chamber ensemble and wailing electric guitars.

name
One of New Amsterdam’s “alt-classical” releases

“The idea to start a cool record label mainly grew out of this developing genre of music that was coming from people with great educations in composition but who were also influenced by pop music and jazz and didn’t fit into any strict marketplace,” explains Greenstein. “The music industry is a place where you’re either popular or classical. Everything forces you to one side or the other. We want to stay in the middle.”

Greenstein recalls telling composer Michael Gordon, co-founder of Bang on a Can, which has its own label, Cantaloupe Music, of the plan to start New Amsterdam. “He tried to convince me it was a terrible idea, that it would take a lot of time from composing,” says Greenstein. “He was coming from a positive place and he was right. Our careers have suffered because of much less time to write music. But the (industry) system we’re operating in is broken from our perspective. It doesn’t meet our needs.”

“I thought there was more risk not [to start the label],” says Brittelle. “When I got out of school, I wanted to spend all day writing music and anything else was a distraction. But coming into the office every day, even on my flexible schedule, has been great for me as a composer. It keeps me in touch and bombarded by great ideas. And there’s a healthy sense of competition because you’ll hear a great record by a friend and it helps you stay in reality, and to know what it takes to really get something out there in the market place. You’ve got to pack up a van [for a gig] but also pack up recordings and mail them.”

[Continue reading here.]

***

name
Joseph Dalton
Photo by Timothy Cahill

Joseph Dalton has been covering the arts scene in New York’s Capital Region since 2002, primarily writing for the Albany Times Union. Many of these essays have been collected in the book Artists & Activists: Making Culture in New York’s Capital Region, published in 2008. Dalton is the former executive director of Composers Recordings, Inc. (CRI), where he produced about 300 recordings of contemporary music. He was also director of a research project on the effects of AIDS on American music which was published in an online report by the Estate Project for Artists with AIDS.

Welcome to the Future

Recording. Performance. Distribution. Copyright. Publishing. When the most basic terms of your field are in flux, it can be hard to see to next month, let alone into the next year, or to prepare for the next decade. Would you have expected music to be where it is today if you had been asked in 1999?

When NewMusicBox launched, it did so both in response to the shrinking space devoted to music in the mainstream media and in order to harness the opportunities presented by ever-expanding internet technologies. In ten years, this magazine has presented thousands of pages of interviews and articles, created audio and video materials offering insight into a wide swath of America’s music and its creators, and served as host to a community of readers eager to add their voices to the dialog.

But music, as well as the online landscape we increasingly rely upon to interact with it, continues to shift beneath our feet. We can guess where we’re headed, we can hope for certain results, we can prepare for imagined difficulties, but what if we could plan for an ideal outcome? On the eve of NewMusicBox’s 10th anniversary, we invited eight people to roll up their sleeves, dust off their magic eight balls, and offer their thoughts on where we’re coming from and (hopefully?) where we may be headed. —MS
Amanda MacBlane: On the Future of Music and Technology
George E. Lewis: a new sonic sociality
John Luther Adams: We Become Ocean
David Kusek: Success You Can Bank On
Richard Gottehrer: Technology Triggers Change
Missy Mazzoli: A Radical Opening Up
Mike Vernusky: Embodying the Future of New Music
Steven Stucky: The End of History

Native American Composers

As a group, Native Americans who write music churn out work in genres from classical to hip-hop, and those in the classical business write in styles from neo-romantic to electro-acoustic and pretty much everything in between. The composers’ heritages run just as wide a gamut as their music. Chickasaw, Mohican, and Navaho are each quite different cultures under the umbrella term “American Indian.”

If the general public is surprised by the concept of American Indians writing classical music, perhaps that’s because Indian arts are often only thought of in traditional contexts: blankets, baskets, dancing, and drums. But scratch the surface and note that in general, these composers did not grow up on a reservation; they were raised in America and fell under the same spell of influences as white, black and Hispanic people, and everyone else raised in the USA.

There is a growing list of successful composers who proudly identify their heritage as American Indian; notably Brent Michael Davids, Jerod Impichchaachaaha’ Tate, R. Carlos Nakai, and the late Louis Ballard. The list is long enough, in fact, that an entire branch of the American Composers Forum—First Nations Composer Initiative (FNCI)—is devoted to supporting this demographic. FNCI advocates for Native American composers working in any genre, from classical and jazz to rock and hip-hop.

 

name

R. Carlos Nakai is widely regarded as the most accomplished Native American flute player in the world. His musical experiences began at a small farm school in Poston, Arizona. Given a choice of instruments through the school’s music program, Nakai requested a flute, but was told that men don’t play flute and was handed a cornet instead, which he despised instantly because of its resemblance to plumbing.

Through high school, Nakai found himself listening to recordings of Beethoven and Mozart, and found his interests were to compose and harmonize. He attended college at NAU and did a stint in the Navy. Though he passed the audition for the Armed Forces School of Music, competition was fierce: he was the 28th person on waiting list for the brass opening.

Nakai says that much of his inspiration is derived from the expressions of the tribal communities of which he is a part. “I build upon the tribal context, while still retaining its essence. Much of what I do builds upon and expresses the environment and experience that I’m having at the moment.”

Nakai’s trademark is his cross-cultural collaborations, blending Native American music with other genres. The ensembles that he performs with exemplify this philosophy: The Wilde Boys Trio with guitarist William Eaton and percussionist Will Clipman; the R. Carlos Nakai Quartet; a collaboration with a Japanese folk ensemble; and a collaboration resulting in Native American and Jewish music with Israeli-born cellist Udi Bar-David, to name a few. Nakai’s open-minded musicianship makes him a success as a soloist with symphony orchestras, and his recordings have been nominated for eight Grammy awards.

What Makes it Native?

Brent Michael Davids (Mohican) maintains that there is no such thing as generic Indian music. “Hollywood might lead you to believe that the sound is of a pentatonic scale. That’s from the Plains tribes, as are the headdresses, moccasins, horses that Hollywood depicts, but there are over 500 different tribes in the country,” Davids explains, and the fact is that most Native music is very sophisticated and complex.

Musician, songwriter, and poet Joy Harjo (Muscogee) notes: “You will not normally hear flutes and powwow drums, yet, these two instruments have become the recognized signature of ‘Native’ music. In all cultures there is a tension between classical and traditional forms, and offshoots. Sometimes the offshoots become viable forms of their own. There is no such thing as ‘Native music’. There are musics. In the Mvskoke (Muscogee) Nation there are many recognizable elements, and basically two strands: ceremonial grounds music and Christian music. At first there appear to be few overlaps between the two, but there are a few.”

According to R. Carlos Nakai (Navajo/Ute), Native American classical music is “an expression of an indigenous Amerindian composer, arranger or instrumentalist who applies the usual practice of the western European discipline to derivations of songs, melodies, portions of sacred music traditions or innovations utilizing Native and European instruments.” Howard Bass, director of cultural programs at the National Museum of the American Indian and curator of that institution’s annual Classical Native series, agrees that there is no single definition. “The composers each have their own approach. In the end, it’s defined by the composers themselves. All of them make use of some form of Native material, but you won’t necessarily detect something that leaps out to you as ‘Native’. For example, composer Raven Chacon (Navajo) uses electronics, and everything he does is informed by his Navajo upbringing, but this may not be apparent to most listeners.”

 

Louis W. Ballard: The father of Native American Composition

It is not enough to acknowledge that American Indian music is different from other music. What is needed in America is an awakening and reorienting of our total spiritual and cultural perspective to embrace, understand and learn from the Aboriginal American what motivates his musical and artistic impulses. —Dr. Louis W. Ballard (Quapaw)

name

Dr. Louis W. Ballard, who passed away in 2007 at the age of 75, is the acknowledged father of Native American composition. A member of the Quapaw and Cherokee nations, Ballard was born in 1931 on the Quapaw Indian Reservation in Oklahoma and studied music theory at Oklahoma University and Tulsa University. He was awarded an honorary doctorate from the College of Santa Fe. He was a founding member of FNCI.

In the 1950s, after getting his music degree at Tulsa, Ballard tought in the Oklahoma public schools. Along the way, he studied privately with Darius Milhaud, Mario Castelnuovo-Tedesco, Carlos Surinach, and Felix Labunski. He became music curriculum director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1970, and he is credited with rejuvenating music education in Native American schools, introducing indigenous instruments and materials into the classrooms. He created and published a guidebook with two CDs called Native American Indian Songs, Taught by Louis W. Ballard. The book, widely acknowledged as a standard text, includes music notations, song analyses, language translation, dance diagrams, lesson plans, color photos, and extensive cultural materials.

Ballard’s national breakthrough as a composer was a 1967 performance of his piece, Why the Duck Has a Short Tail by the Phoenix Symphony, with Dennis Russell Davies conducting. For narrator and symphony orchestra, the piece is based on a traditional Navaho tale. This performance led to a commission for Incident at Wounded Knee for the Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra; the orchestra premiered the work in 1974 again under the direction of Davies who at the time was the music director of the SPCO.

In 1989, the Beethoven House Chamber Music Hall in Bonn, Germany mounted a program dedicated to Ballard’s compositions; he was the first American composer to have that distinction. His works are usually programmatic, and other notable pieces in his catalogue include Ritmo Indio for woodwind quintet; Moontide: the Man Who Hated Money, an opera; The Maid in the Mist and Thunder Beings for orchestra; and Will Rogers: Tribute to a Great American, a cantata.

A major compositional inspiration for Ballard was composer Béla Bartók, who collected the traditional folk songs of his native Hungary and used them to infuse and inform his compositions. Similarly, Ballard made use of melodies that he had heard growing up on the reservation in his own works.

 

Before Ballard

Long before Ballard began composing, there was a group of non-Native American composers who attempted to use Native American themes and materials as the basis for their own music. The “Indianist” movement of late 19th and early 20th century America was comprised of European-trained composers such as Charles Wakefield Cadman (1881-1946) and Arthur Farwell (1872-1952). Amy Beach (1867-1944) and Edward McDowell (1860-1908) also composed “Indianist” works. All were no doubt spurred on by Czech composer Antonin Dvorak’s fascination with African American and Native American musics during his visits to the United States in the 1890s.

According to Davids, there actually were some Native American composers during the Carlisle Boarding School era, which was roughly contemporaneous with the Indianists, although details are scarce. The Carlisle Boarding School was the first of a number of Indian boarding schools in the United States in operation from the 1870s to around 1930. The schools were essentially assimilation academies, part of the effort to “civilize” Native Americans by forcing English-language European curriculum into school-aged children’s education; their disturbingly brutal motto was “Kill the Indian, Save the Man.” Students weren’t permitted to sing Native songs, but they were taught brass and other instruments. There was a jazz band, a marching band, and a spate of recitals featuring music by such European favorites as Haydn and Mozart.

Nakai mentions Native American composers in the 1920s and 30s who wrote tunes that became jingles for cigarette and beer commercials. These melodies were erroneously credited to black American composers, however, and the names of the Native Americans responsible have tragically been lost.

name
Pepper’s Pow Wow (1971) Wounded Bird Records

Jim Pepper (Kaw/Creek, 1941-1992) was a jazz saxophonist and composer whose career was roughly concurrent with that of Ballard’s. Pepper was a pioneer in the jazz fusion movement, and was known for combining jazz and Native American elements in his compositions. In the 1960s his jazz-rock fusion band The Free Spirits included the now-legendary guitarist Larry Coryell. Witchi Tai To, Pepper’s composition with a later incarnation of this band, was a song that Pepper crafted from ritual chants he learned from his Kaw grandfather. This song was a crossover hit and was subsequently covered dozens of times by other artists. Encouraged by his colleagues Don Cherry and Ornette Coleman, Pepper incorporated more Native American elements into his compositions and jazz style, and his first album under his own name, Pepper’s Pow Wow, essentially announced this intent. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, Pepper recorded with a vast range of jazz greats, including Cherry, Joe Lovano, Bill Frisell, Charlie Haden, Paul Motian, and Dewey Redman.

But ultimately the influence of current Native American

One of the most active and visible Native American composers today is composer and flutist Brent Michael Davids. Davids was born in 1959 in Madison, Wisconsin, and is a member of the Mohican nation. He says he got his start as a composer when he was a teenager, hearing George Crumb’s Black Angels. “I was amazed at the sounds he got. The music sounded like the title. It sounds like what it’s supposed to be. That got me hooked.” Davids has been composing ever since, and his first commission came just two years later, at age 18.

Davids, one of the founders of the FNCI, writes music for a living. “As a Native, I don’t see myself as a traditionalist. I am influenced by tradition, but I’m more of an experimentalist. I write experimental chamber works and picture notation a la George Crumb. Plus I invent instruments, and write music for dance, theater, film, choruses and electronics.” Davids is also a teacher, and is especially active with Native American youth.

composition all leads back to Ballard. Composers Jerod Impichchaachaaha’ Tate (Chickasaw), Brent Michael Davids, and others can be viewed as disciples of Ballard. According to Tate, “The fact that he existed was the biggest inspiration to me. As a mixed-blood Indian and classical pianist, I never imaged the two could come together.”

Davids first heard about Ballard in 1979, when he was an undergraduate student at Northern Illinois University. “I was becoming a ‘stylist’, recalls Davids, “I studied privately with Paul Steg, who was a walking encyclopedia. For my lessons, I had to write pieces in different styles. I’d bring examples to lessons—thinking I had come up with something wholly original—but Steg would always compare the style to someone else. One day, something I wrote reminded him of Louis Ballard. I wrote a letter to Ballard, and he responded and encouraged me.” Over the years, Davids became close to Ballard and his family, understanding Ballard’s compositional style so well that he was able to complete Ballard’s Indiana Concerto for Piano and Orchestra, left unfinished at the time of the composer’s death. Mario Venzago conducted the Indianapolis Symphony in the premiere in January 2008 with Italian pianist Emanuele Arciuli for whom the concerto was commissioned.

 

FNCI

name

Over the past decade, a variety of programs have started across the country to specifically promote music by Native American composers. In 2004, Brent Michael Davids approached John Nuechterlein, President and CEO of the American Composers Forum (ACF), about forming a virtual chapter of ACF to serve and connect Native Americans composers and performers. Upon receiving a planning grant from the Ford Foundation later that year, ACF launched the First Nations Composer Initiative (FNCI). Under the leadership of Georgia Wettlin-Larsen and operating out of the ACF’s offices in St. Paul, Minnesota, FNCI supports projects throughout the United States from its offices in St. Paul, Minnesota.

FNCI’s mission is to give Native American composers and musicians access to information and opportunities for collaboration. Its outreach includes short-term residencies for American Indian artists intended to foster musical and artistic development within tribal and urban Indian communities. Since January 2007, FNCI has offered Common Ground grants for commissions, residencies, performance, production, travel, study, and outreach. Other programs include the whimsically acronymed CANOE (Composer Apprentice National Outreach Endeavor), established in 2006, which places American Indian composers in residency to teach American Indian high school students. Through on-line forums, the FNCI considers itself a meeting ground, linking composers, performers, and audiences in cyberspace. FNCI currently serves over 100 Native American composers and performers and to date has awarded 36 grants to a total of 43 artists.

 

Classical Native

name
Photo by Alana Rothstein

Jerod Impichchaachaaha’ Tate was born in 1968 in Norman, Oklahoma, and is a citizen of the Chickasaw Nation. After receiving a degree in piano performance from Northwestern University, he went on to study at the Cleveland Institute of Music. But he didn’t focus on composition until his mother, choreographer Dr. Patricia Tate, commissioned him to score a ballet, Winter Moons, in 1992. Since then, his music has been performed across the country by ensembles ranging from the National Symphony Orchestra to the Colorado Ballet.

Tate is the artistic director for the Chickasaw Chamber Music Festival and is composer-in-residence for the Chickasaw Summer Arts Academy, a program for children in Oklahoma age 19 and under, and was composer-in-residence for Native American Composers Apprentice Project (NACAP). Last year, Tate was the recipient of a Joyce Foundation Award in conjunction with the American Composers Forum, in which he taught composition to American Indian high school students in Minneapolis.

Having decided to record his music on Thunderbird Records, a new label that specializes in Native American composers and performers, he cold-called the San Francisco Symphony with his proposal. And they bit. “To be quite honest, this rarely happens,” SFS General Manager John Kieser told Donald Rosenberg of the Cleveland Plain Dealer. But according to Rosenberg’s account, Kieser and SFS Music Director Michael Tilson Thomas were impressed with Tate’s music, which employs Chickasaw source materials in highly evocative settings, complete with haunting solo lines, orchestral colors and vocal effects.

[Ed. Note: Jerod Impichchaachaaha’ Tate is the April 2009 Cover of NewMusicBox.]

Another important vehicle for bringing together Native American composers and musicians is the Classical Native series at the National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) in Washington, D.C. Both Howard Bass, public programs producer, and Dr. Helen Maynor Scheirbeck, senior advisor for museum programs and scholarly research at the museum, had very strong interest in the topic. Four years ago, Bass began to put together programs for the series when he visited FNCI in St. Paul, where he met with program director Georgia Wettlin-Larsen (Assiniboine/Nakota) and composers Davids, Tate, and others.

Part of the mission at NMAI is to provide a venue for Native talent and to dispel common misconceptions and stereotypes of Native people. Classical Native, which presented its first series in October 2006, fits that mission well. In that first year, the Classical Native brought together a score of Native American composers and performers to present 12 performances over four days. Similar Classical Native series were mounted at the NMAI in Fall 2007 and Fall 2008.

Because of decreased resources, plans for a 2009 celebration have been telescoped to a single work, Victor Rasgado’s children’s opera, El conejo y el coyote. The opera, which will be performed at the NMAI on November 5, 6 and 7, 2009, is based on a Zapotecas legend and is sung in an imaginary language. Bass hopes to find ways to continue to highlight the work of Native composers and classical musicians next year and beyond, despite the challenges of diminished resources.

 

Thunderbird Records

name

Alan Bise has taken the advice “find a niche” to heart. Recently Bise, an audio engineer who is classical music producer for the Cleveland-based Azica Records, was inspired to launch a record label of solely Native American composers and performers. In 2004, he had produced a recording of compositions by David Yeagley (Comanche) with James Pellerite performing on cedar flute. According to Bise, this was the first full-length album of a single Native American composer, and this rarity is one of the things that inspired Bise to create Thunderbird Records specifically for that niche.

name

David Yeagley (Comanche) is a composer, pianist, and portrait artist. His collection of compositions for Native Indian flute is recorded on the Azica label. With degrees from Oberlin, Yale, Emory and the University of Arizona, Yeagley also writes poetry and fiction and plays the Native American flute. He has studied composition with Daniel Asia, Krzysztof Penderecki, Richard Hoffman and Joseph Wood. Yeagley has also made a name for himself as a conservative political commentator, and he has appeared on the O’Reilly Factor, C-SPAN, and FrontPageMag.com.

The idea for Thunderbird Records stemmed from an emotional reaction Bise had at a performance of a piece by Jerod Tate, a friend from their student days at the Cleveland Institute of Music. Bise was moved by both the music and the programmatic story behind it, and “a light bulb went off. I can get to know these people and this music and have others hear it as well. There are so many different styles of American Indian music, some composers will use Native themes and melodies while others may write like Beethoven. For Thunderbird I decided I shouldn’t make artistic judgments about composers. The music may not reflect my own personal taste, but the quality of performance should be as high as possible.”

Thunderbird’s sole release thus far is the aforementioned recording of the San Fransisco Symphony performing works by Jerod Impichchaachaaha’ Tate, released in March 2008. But Bise asserts that there are several more projects in Thunderbird’s pipeline.

 

Bringing up a New Generation of Composers

name

Raven Chacon is a working composer living in Los Angeles. Born and raised on a Navajo reservation in Arizona, Chacon has studied and/or collaborated with composers Morton Subotnick, James Tenney, and Glenn Branca. He is Composer-in-Residence with the Native American Composers Apprenticeship Project, a program aimed at exposing Native American youngsters to the world of composition. His catalogue of works include a series of pieces for processed voice and Native flute and percussion and Meet the Beatles, an audio collage involving 10,000 samples from music by The Beatles.

Jerod Tate, Brent Michael Davids, Raven Chacon, and others are pushing forth a new generation of composers. In 2001, in association with the Grand Canyon Music Festival, Davids founded the Native American Composer Apprentice Program (NACAP) with the vision of creating a pool of young Native American composers. Each year, a Native composer (Raven Chacon has been the composer-in-residence for the past few years and will return this summer) works with students selected from four area high schools, with intensive one-on-one instruction over a period of several weeks. The resulting compositions are premiered by a top-shelf professional string quartet (the string quartet Ethel returns in 2009) at the GCMF.

This particular program has already begat a poster-child: Michael Begay was one of the student composers in 2001 and, having now graduated from college, will be back this summer as the program’s assistant composer in residence. This summer’s program culminates with the NACAP Fair on September 20 at the Grand Canyon National Park, with workshops and a final concert in which all the students’ new works will be played.

Chacon and Davids have expanded this program to other parts of the country. CANOE stands for Composer Apprentice National Outreach Endeavor, and composers work with students in Minnesota, North and South Dakota, Wisconsin and California.

 

Not Native Enough?

name
Photo by Paul Abdoo

Joy Harjo is a modern renaissance woman. She is equally lauded for her work as a poet, composer and visual artist. Her first love was music, and she has fond childhood memories of watching her mother compose songs on her Underwood typewriter. Harjo met Louis Ballard while she was studying at the Institute of American Arts in Santa Fe. He became her advisor and mentor, and she remained close to him until he died. Also a one-time student of Jim Pepper, Harjo sings and plays tenor saxophone with her band, Poetic Justice and as a solo performer.

While the intent of all of these programs is to help Native American composers bring attention to their music, there is always the danger that putting a label on these composers can ghettoize what they do. The flip side of dispelling misconceptions and stereotypes is the question “Is it Native enough?”. Joy Harjo says that there have been times when “her music was dismissed as not Native enough because the flute and powwow drums were not present.”

The genre is still hindered by stereotypes, Nakai maintains. “I have heard [audiences] at the convocations that we’ve held say that’s not American Indian music because it doesn’t have the 1-2-1-2 beat, it doesn’t use just rattles and drums, and the performers are not dressed in Native clothing. So I’m almost forced to appear in Native American dress when I perform. When I don’t, there’s the guarded response of ‘He’s trying to be something he isn’t,’ so when I appear onstage in a tux with a small bit of Native regalia, [the reaction is] ‘Don’t you respect your culture?’ I have to pack my suitcase very carefully.”

***

name
Gail Wein; Photo by Chad Evans Wyatt

Gail Wein‘s writing credits include reviews and articles for The Washington Post, MusicalAmerica.com, and andante.com, as well as CD booklet notes for Joan Tower’s triple-Grammy winner Made in America. Her diverse career path runs the gamut from producer for National Public Radio’s Performance Today and general manager of the contemporary chamber ensemble Voices of Change to stints as a computer programmer and an actuary.